Our federal government has instructed our federal, state and local police agencies that everyone who purports to be a SOVEREIGN should be TREATED as a TERRORIST! They have also brainwashed the American public into believing that being a SOVEREIGN is anti-American and unpatriotic! Perhaps this is: “The POT calling the KETTLE black?”
WHAT IS SOVEREIGNTY? It is the inherent right and prerogative of a civilized people to rule itself, and to dictate all of the forms and conditions of the institutions it sets up to carry out this rule. Ironically, the U.S. SUPREME COURT agrees with those people who claim to be SOVEREIGN citizens of the American Republic!
Bond vs. UNITED STATES, 529 US 334 – 2000, The Supreme Court held that the American People are in fact Sovereign and not the States or the Government. The court went on to define that local, state and federal law enforcement officers were committing unlawful actions against the Sovereign People by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable for their actions.
Bond v. United States, 529 US 334 - 2000 - Supreme Court - Cited by 761 litigants in other cases.
Bond v. US, 131 S. Ct. 2355 - 2011 - Supreme Court - Cited by 306 “ “
Bond v. US, 1 F. 3d 631 - 1993 - Court of Appeals, 7th - Cited by 66 “ “
What are the implications of this 2000, U. S. Supreme Court ruling?
1] The delegates to the first Federal Convention prohibited the use of corporations by all governments representing the American Republic. Therefore, all of these corporate governments and their corporate laws are a usurpation of the organic Constitution of the United States of America. All State Governments are now sub-corporations of the Federal Government, making all Courts and all law enforcement personnel, corporate federal agencies or employees. [See: James Madison Journal of the Federal Convention, Vol. 2, P. 722] and [Pull up your State Code on your PC and search the Code for the words “District of Columbia” and “Federal Government.” You will receive about 1000 references linking your state to the federal government.]
2] The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, State Legislatures, City Councils, Municipalities and all State and Federal Courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional branches of government.
3] Corporations are privately owned businesses, meaning that the Corporate United States belongs to one or more private individuals, which is always governed by a Board of Directors. The Corporate United States is privately owned by a group of European Royal and Elite individuals tied to the Federal Reserve System and the letters of incorporation are recorded in the Vatican. The President of the United States is actually the CEO of the United States and the Congress and all others are corporate employees. Everything they do is in the interest of the corporate owners! I can’t access those documents because of National Security.
4] In order to promulgate and enforce Criminal Laws to govern the SOVEREIGN public, government must be SOVEREIGN too, which is an accepted RULE of LAW derived from the, Ancient Law of Kings. Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they are a fiction and only exist on paper.
5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal there true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do!
6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations?
[Citations and Complaints are contracts but they lack transparency because you were never told what might happen to you if you agree to contract, and that you had a right to refuse the accommodation!]
7] Do any of Americas Courts have Jurisdiction over a SOVEREIGN? Yes … but only by your consent to be judged by the Court. Can they compel [Summon or Subpoena] you to appear or participate in their process? No … they can’t compel you and Yes … they can ask but you can reject the accommodation in writing and nothing can be done about it because you have refused to give the court jurisdiction over you!
8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bank v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
9] There being no Constitutional Criminal Laws or Transparency in the American Justice System, everyone arrested, convicted and sentenced to prison under these CIVIL LAWS are in prison by CONSENT and therein, all American Jails are actually DEBTORS PRISONS!
10] Most of the County and State Prisons and all of the Federal Prisons are privately owned corporate businesses for profit, which kick back to the sentencing Judges. The Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch provides general oversight, for these institutions. So if you are convicted in these Courts, you can expect to serve some jail time! Now you know why America has such high prison populations!
11] Can the State Government and Courts take Custody of your children? Only with your consent, otherwise their agents and officers can be held personally liable for their actions! Orphans are a different matter and can become wards of the Court until emancipated.
Corporate governments are a usurpation of the organic American Constitution and this corporatist onslaught in America has since its creation, been an ANTI-SOVEREIGN and TERRORIST REGIME and are in fact the real TERRORIST and TRAITORS to the American Republic.
Blessings, Judge Dale, retired
This is a very well written article that can help many to understand what is going on. Thank you
This is very interesting but from what I’ve been told even though this is true you still can’t use this information.The way this government is set up I would have a snowball chance in hades to be successful using this theory. What are others thoughts?
Call their bluff! File a DEMAND FOR APPARENT AUTHORITY AND ACTUAL AUTHORITY. Sad to say, but I’m facing difficulties myself and I’m trying to hang on to my life as long as possible so that I could see the day that these thugs get put away for good.
God Bless you Ben,e too. God bless America on this day and don’t claim to be a citizen of any kind unless you work for the government. Citizens owe an allegiance to a superior entity. Sovereigns are the superior entity. There really is only one and we his or her children represent that but in terms of awesome Judge Dale, we are sovereigns in relation to government because we created government. Sovereign is a term meaning creator. The creators always superior. Amen
This is a treasonous set up. When our farmers of this country Literally wrote it on record that all is sovereign and created by God and these mammon lovers are trying to Korea’s the people by lying and making up foolishness like this! Did NOT CLAIM any US citizenship for that is a trick to put you in bondage! Look what’s happen today 2020
Wow, then why isn’t something being done by the legal system to put a stop to it? I guess fear of reprisals, come to mind. Of course we are in the period of the end of this age and eventually it will come to pass that those that have placed the lives of people in jeopardy over money and power of control WILL suffer complete and total condemnation from a higher power than themselves, so be it. All of us that are in this world are here because we are disobedient to that higher power, therefore we the people have created this impasse by our beliefs and desires, for our lives, what we think is true will present itself as the truth, and, we believe the truth.
Getting back to all the people of the world being on this Garden of Eden, which it really is but now is a jail for us all, change your attitude and be obedient to that higher power and you will have eternal life, be disobedient and you will have eternal death. Think about it, scribes.
Love, Love, Love Judge Dale…this is very good, but there is much more. You can all go to this link and read more from Judge Dale: http://peoplestrustmalaysia.wordpress.com/ucc/strawman/
When you’re done you can look around on their site and find even more. He really helps to put all the pieces together. He does clearly state that you must really educate yourself in all of this and be very confident when using it because they will try and confuse you and trip you up. Love & Light!!
Thank you for the info, Tonia. To Judge Dale, you are the best! Thank you for taking the time to share this information with us.
Ok, if that’s the way they want it, then arrest those who call themselves sovereign. Remember, the state and federal government claim to be sovereigns. Think about it please. Step out of the box. Now…who should be arrested?
I read this article and I am.astonished by what I’ve read. I am curious about becoming a sovereign citizen and would like to know more about it in regards to getting the process started and all the important information I should know. I also have another question, if someone is on probation, should they give up on trying to become a sovereign citizen? Please let me know in your own spare time. Thank you.
Anita, I have been looking into it as well. What I know so far, is this; You are going to have to read just about every book out there on becoming sovereign, and being your own secured creditor. You have to know the laws, in and out. The reason is , when you get pulled over and you don’t have a drivers license, for example, with out knowing what to say, you will be in trouble like the rest of us. I don’t know about the probation part, but I do know becoming sovereign isn’t something you do over night. You bascially have to give your birth cert. back to the county. There are many benefits, if done correctly, and I understand you are entitled to get all the money back that you pd in taxes as well as other monies, including cashing in on your birth certificate, which is a bond. Look it up at treasurydirect.gov. People are sold on the new york stock exchange and they don’t even know it. There are down falls, also. If you attempt to become sovereign, and you do something wrong, I would hate to see the back fire from that. You could be red-flagged. Also, giving back your birth cert, and ss card, is something you want to do, only if you have a way to support yourself from there on out. I don’t know anyone who has got a job or anything else with out that and state issued id. No government assistance of any kind either. If you are still interested, there are people who teach you what you need to know to be sovereign for a price. Illuminating Minds is having a special for $99. that ends tonight. For another fee, they will do everything for you so it is done right. I think that cost is under $300. Good luck. My email is [email protected]. Let me know if you do it or want to share any info, I am intrigued by the whole thing.
I’ve been looking for information surrounding Judge Dale’s history but I’ve been unable to find much so far. What is Judge Dale’s first name?
Dale B. Lindman - Judgepedia
judgepedia.org/index.php/Dale_B._Lindman
Nov 28, 2024 - Dale B. Lindman was a Minnesota Second Judicial District judge for Ramsey County, Minnesota. He served in this position from October of …
You visited this page on 9/24/13.
His complete name is Judge Dale B. Lindman. He was a Judge in Ramsey County Minnesota between 1998-2012. He was also a Juris Doctor (look up the term), and a trial Attorney for 26 years. He grew terribly vexed with the corruption within our judicial system. So he decided to retire.
This is why they can be held accountable under their Statutes, codes and regulations made for them. You do not “become Sovereign” you are Sovereign but never act that way so they presume your an idiot and they need to take care of you or the alternative an enemy of the corporation. Never answer a question except with another question (a king asks questions, a servant answers), keep your crown, ask pertinent questions. “are you a public servant?” yes “do you have any evidence that I am a public servant?” No, “Do you have any evidence that I am a servant of any kind?” No, “Good then I am still a master and as you have stated you are a servant of the people,,, Conduct your self accordingly,, are we clear?” Get nose to nose or eyeball to eyeball when you say “are we clear?”
Now if you have the back bone (if your a conditioned American you probably don’t, but fake it .. pretend like you have a backbone and command) then go on and ask the ten questions of oath verification and/or indictment, with two witnesses, notarize them and record them and/or bring charges against them. Federal charges for impersonating an officer, breach of fiduciary duty, creation of false securities, creation of false obligations, passing or uttering, etc etc.. read and get your dumbed down ass knowledgeable!!! If you have no clue as to how to sail a ship, how on earth are you going to convince the pirates that this is your ship? The Statutes are the “common Law” everyone keeps talking about.. it is law for the common man/idiot because all ya gotta do is secure the evidence and find the statute that fits and bring an action using that Statute only… 1. evidence, certified, authenticated, recorded and placed in to evidence by “exhibit” 2. Find the Statute that applies 3. Sue them under that Federal Statute only not asking “for other relief” but only the penalty damages and compensatory damages if allowed. 4. Take that “win” and get a few more if there are other Federal Statutes that apply and use them to force the State Corporate Courts to enforce State Statutes using the Federal action (adjudication) as evidence exhibits. Do it again for other State Statutes and then finally bring an “Equity” action which requires you to bring “everything” all at one time (now that you are familiar with the violations and procedures etc. Anticipate there Attorney BS Smoke screens and distractions, and stay on point. When they file or write a bunch of crap, move the court to strike it for frivolous, vexatious and unresponsive and immaterial to the case.) One of the keys is to do pre-trial discovery and pre anything inquiries, FOIA’s and other requests for information which will become evidence that they do not have as required. It is a bit difficult for any judge to ignore a federal judgement that a document is a forgery, fraudulent, counterfeit and not find that the attorney who filed such forged, fraudulent and counterfeit instrument upon the public record is guilty of corrupting the public record by doing so. (sent a letter of inquiry as to the status of a “loan” with the “sevicer” One West in regards to an LXS 2006-12N trust, which had been foreclosed upon four years earlier. They responded in writing that it was still in the trust and had never left… Sent a letter to the alleged principles of the attorney firm that brought the foreclosure asking if they were in fact agents/attorneys for them and if so did they authorize them to file false, fraudulent or counterfeit instruments upon the public records on their behalf….” No NO NO we did not” came the reply… so now the alleged principle has not confirmed but denied that the attorneys are representing them at all!! by their own writings… oops another piece of evidence.) It is a process.. Do NOT short cut it!! the process is for you to learn from as you’re gathering evidence. This is the knowledge hidden from you which they went to great lengths to distract you from. Yes you are going back to school a real school but if you choose to avoid it then you will continue to be imposed upon without the knowledge of remedy or protection!! Thus you are “volunteering” to be fuked!! Don;t complain! Take it like a good United States Citizen subject till your broke, sick in jail, on the street homeless and destitute in the land of freedom.
There is no “Magic Bullet” one step process. you can not go to the store and buy it and no attorney will defend you or prosecute for you above his allegiance to the corporate court that he does business in and wants to continue doing business in for money and profit along with the corp. State of … . you can not “cheat” on these tests like 80% of college graduates admit to doing (and you wonder why those in power cheat..monkey see monkey do). Do your homework!! It is worth it. At first your head will feel like it is going to explode but that is just because you are exercising those other brain cells .. they will get used to it and even enjoy it… think of every case as a gossip column the inside story or a play book of a game played or video of the game to learn the activities of your opposing team. ie… they invariably use the “failure to state a claim” routine affirmative defense to stuff your shot.. sometimes it is correct, we tend to wine and complain and never state any facts, present any evidence or show damage/cause for the court to take action, so find someone who is more knowledgeable and let them review it. It is a team effort. Go to court and see how they do it, then find a pro se and see how they don;t do it right and get slamed or how they do it right and force the court to confess the law/statute upon your opponent. It is a combination of chess (thinking three to five moves ahead (knowing their moves ahead of time and process)) and any other game … tennis with a ball that bounces in your court which you must return immediately (knowing ahead of time and ready with a response is the way to go, be the one to bring a return motion(s) to control the game. knowing that a “loss” at one level is great because it is like a setup for the next court and evidence of their collusion etc.) Always be on the offensive not the defensive. Blessings all =may your desires be fulfilled
We are all born Sovereign, but the moment we are entered into their database and given a birth cert and social security card, you are from that moment on, owned by the Corporation . that is known as The United States of America.
Thanks for the information. Cohesive and compelling. Any words of advice as to how to glean reputable information while steering clear of the hype and carpet bagger types? I wish you well in all your endeavors.
If any of you have done thorough research, you will note that “Judge Dale” never gives his/her full name. Doesn’t that seem odd to you? I say NEVER believe anyone who will not give his/her full identification so that the existence of this person can be verified to be whom s/he claims to be. Try to find this “Judge Dale” and if you find him/her, let me know. I’ve done extensive research to no avail. This person does not exist.
Does anyone know if one can become Sovereign after they have been dragged into the court system.
I and others have read Bond v. US and cannot find the supreme court saying anything about the people beling sovereign. I found Judge Dale’s article on several sites but none of them confirm his claim as valid (wish it were so).
Resources for reclaiming Sovereignty, no matter whether you have been through court system. https://exodus200.wordpress.com/
http://tribalsovereignnations.com/reclaim-your-sovereign-status/
Pay alleged bills, by A4V : http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/
Become a ‘World Citizen’ and obtain World Citizen Passport, Photo ID etc If you do the Exodus process, I recommend applying for World Citizen docs after reclaiming sovereignty through Exodus, so that your new passport and ID will be in your new sovereign name as per the documents issued by the Exodus process. Also, Kate of Gaia site has great info on Losing the name to win the game.
P.S. Link to World Citizen process: http://www.worldservice.org/docpass.html
i think the elites are trying to erase certain court cases that have actually gone down.
Thank you for link, I am loading them as I type. I am wondering if you or if you know anyone you could put me in touch with who is sovereign..I have a few questions I cant seem to find the answers for, anywhere. [email protected]
Has anybody done there research? The Bond case has NOTHING to do with the Sovereign, it is all about a fourth amendment right…it is misquoted…and if you use this case the judge will laugh at you….check the cites people!!!
Bond vs. UNITED STATES, 529 US 334 – 2000, The Supreme Court
held that the American People are in fact Sovereign and not the States
or the Government. The court went on to define that local, state and
federal law enforcement officers were committing unlawful actions
against the Sovereign People by the enforcement of the laws and are
personally liable for their actions
Chase,
Does that make sense? You say the case has nothing to do with the sovereign, but cite it as the Supreme Court held that the American people are Sovereign.
Also, in the last 2 months I read that the Pope dissolved all corporations. Does anyone know where to find that?
How about a Habeas Corpus? How can the court be considered competent if their “commission” isn’t filed?
Where can one file it in with then?…as in which court?
Is their someone i can contact to help me become a sovereign citizen
Be careful, look up Barefoot Bob and know this; sovereign and citizen is an oxymoron. Sovereign being one supreme and citizen being one oweing allegiance to another.
Do you overstand/sovereign or understand/citizen. There is only one sovereign and we represent him and understand him only . Of course you might better understand your boss too but never accept sovereign citizen, one an not exist and that’s a bad trap. Other than that judge Dale is cool.
SOVEREIGNTY AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
Be it known to all who call themselves “government,” their “courts,” agents, corporations and other parties, that I, Kenneth David Rich© am a natural, freeborn sovereign individual, without subjects. I am neither subject to any entity anywhere, nor is any entity subject to me. I neither dominate anyone, nor am I dominated.
I am not a “person” as defined in commercial “statutes” when such definition includes “artificial entities.” I refuse to be treated as a “federally” or “state” created entity which is only capable of exercising certain rights, privileges, or immunities as specifically “granted” by “federal” or “state” “governments.” I, Kenneth David Rich© am created by GOD alone and subject only to my true Creator, GOD.
I am not a fictitious corporate entity, or public office holder using any fraudulent government-created, upper case name KENNETH DAVID RICH that resembles my natural name. This upper case fictional identity was forged for illegal commercial gain from a birth certificate, without full disclosure and without my consent or my mother’s consent.
I may voluntarily choose to comply with the “laws” which others attempt to impose upon me, but no such “laws,” nor their “enforcers,” have any authority over me. I am not in any “jurisdiction,” for I am not of subject status.
Unless I have willfully harmed or violated someone or someone’s property without their consent, I have not committed any crime, and am therefore not subject to any penalty.
Thus, be it known to all, that I reserve my natural right not to be compelled to perform under any “contract” that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. Furthermore, I do not accept the “liability” associated with the compelled and pretended “benefit” of any hidden or unrevealed “contract” or “commercial agreement.”
As such, the hidden or unrevealed “contracts” that supposedly create “obligations” to perform, for persons of subject status, are inapplicable to me, and are null and void. If I have participated in any of the supposed “benefits” associated with these hidden “contracts,” I have done so under duress, for lack of any other practical alternative. I may have received such “benefits” but I have not accepted them in a manner that binds me to anything.
Any such participation does not constitute “acceptance,” because of the absence of full disclosure of any valid offer, and voluntary consent without misrepresentation or coercion. Without a valid voluntary offer and acceptance, knowingly entered into by both parties, there is no “meeting of the minds,” and therefore no valid contract. Any supposed “contract” is therefore void, from the beginning.
From my age of consent to the date affixed below I have never signed a contract knowingly, willingly, intelligently, voluntarily, and intentionally whereby I have waived any of my natural inherent rights, and, as such, take notice that I revoke, cancel, and make void from the beginning my signature on any and all “contracts,” “agreements,” “forms,” or any “instrument” which may be construed in any way to give any agency or department of any “government” any “authority,” “venue,” or “jurisdiction” over me.
Typical examples of such compelled and pretended “benefits” are:
1. “Birth Certificate”: The fact that a “birth certificate” was issued to me by a local hospital or “government” agency when I was born, is irrelevant to my sovereignty. No status, high or low, can be assigned to another person through a piece of paper, without the recipient’s full knowledge and consent. Therefore, such a piece of paper provides date and place information only. It indicates nothing about “jurisdiction,” nothing about property ownership, nothing about rights, and nothing about subject status. The only documents or commercial contracts that can have any significance, as it concerns my status in society, are those which I have signed as an adult, with full knowledge and consent, meeting true requirements of an “enforceable” contract, free from non-disclosure, misrepresentation, or coercion of any kind.
2. The use of national currency to discharge my debts: I have used these only because there is no other widely recognized currency.
3. The use of a bank account: If there is any hidden “contract” behind an account, my signature therewith gives no validity to it. The signature is only for verification of identity. I cannot be obligated to fulfill any hidden or unrevealed “contract” whatsoever, due to the absence of full disclosure and voluntary consent. Likewise, my use of the bank account is due to the absence of an alternative. To not use any bank at all is very difficult and impractical.
4. The use of a “driver’s license”: There is no real need for me to have such a “license” for travelling in a car. However, if I am stopped for any reason and found to be without a “license,” it is likely I would be unduly harassed and penalized. Therefore, under duress, I carry a “license” only to avoid extreme inconvenience.
5. “State plates” on my car: Similarly, if I have “registered” my car with the “state” and carry the “state plates” on it, I have done so only because to have any other “plates” or no “plates” at all, causes me to run the risk of “police officer” harassment and extreme inconvenience.
6. The use of a “passport”: There is no real need for me to have a “passport” (or other associated “permits,” “visas,” etc.) to travel. I have the right to travel without hindrance, wherever, however, and whenever I wish, so long as I do not encroach upon the private property of others. Though without a “passport,” my right to travel is unduly hindered. Therefore, under duress, I only use a “passport” to prevent extreme inconvenience and to ensure that I can travel from one “country” to another at all.
7. Past “filing” of “tax returns”: Because such “tax returns” were “filed” under threat, duress, and coercion, and no two-way contract was ever signed with full disclosure, there is nothing in any past “filing” of “tax returns” or payments that created any valid contract. Therefore, no obligation on my part was ever created.
8. Past “enrolment” and “voting”: Similarly, since no obligation to perform in any manner was ever revealed in print, as part of the “requirements” for the supposed “privilege” to “enroll” and “vote,” any such “enrolment” or “voting” does not oblige me to do anything, nor grant any “jurisdiction” over me to anyone.
9. “Citizenship”: Any document I may have ever signed, in which I answered “yes” to the question, “Are you a UNITED STATES citizen?” - cannot be used to compromise my status as a sovereign, nor obligate me to perform in any manner. This is because without full written disclosure of the definition and consequences of such supposed “citizenship,” provided in a document bearing my signature given freely without misrepresentation or coercion, there can be no binding contract.
I am not a “UNITED STATES citizen.” I am not a “resident of,” an “inhabitant of,” a “franchise of,” a “subject of,” a “ward of,” the “property of,” the “chattel of,” or “subject to the jurisdiction of” any “monarch” or any corporate “commonwealth,” “federal,” “state,” “territory,” “county,” “council,” “city,” “municipal body politic,” or other “government” allegedly “created” under the “authority” of a “constitution” or other “enactment.” I am not subject to any “legislation,” department, or agency created by such “authorities,” nor to the “jurisdiction” of any employees, officers, or agents deriving their “authority” therefrom. Nor do any of the “statutes” or “regulations” of such “authorities” apply to me or have any “jurisdiction” over me.
Further, I am not a subject of any “courts” or bound by “precedents” of any “courts,” deriving their “jurisdiction” from said “authorities.” Take notice that I hereby cancel and make void from the beginning any such “instrument” or any presumed “election” made by any “government” or any agency or department thereof, that I am or ever have voluntarily elected to be treated as a subject of any “monarch” or a “[insert name of “country” here] citizen,” or a “resident” of any “commonwealth,” “state,” “territory,” “possession,” “instrumentality,” “enclave,” “division,” “district,” or “province,” subject to their “jurisdiction(s).”
10. “Constitution”: The document supposedly setting forth the foundations of a “country” and “its” “government,” has no inherent authority or obligation. A “constitution” has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between two or more individuals, and then it is limited only to those individuals who have specifically entered into it. At most, such a document could be a contract between the existing people at the time of its creation, but no-one has the right, authority, or power to bind their posterity. I have not knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally entered into any such “constitution” contract to oblige myself thereby, therefore such a document is inapplicable to me, and anyone claiming to derive their “authority” from such a document has no “jurisdiction” over me.
11. Use of semantics: There are some immature people with mental imbalances, such as the craving to dominate other people, who masquerade as “government,” and call the noises and scribbles that emanate from their mouths and pens “the law” which “must be obeyed.” Just because they alter definitions of words in their “law” books to their supposed advantage, doesn’t mean I accept those definitions. The fact that they define the words “person,” “address,” “mail,” “resident,” “motor vehicle,” “driving,” “passenger,” “employee,” “income,” and many others, in ways different from the common usage, so as to be associated with a subject or slave status, means nothing in real life.
Because the “courts” have become entangled in the game of semantics, be it known to all “courts” and all parties, that if I have ever signed any document or spoken any words on record, using words defined by twists in any “law” books different from the common usage, there can be no effect whatsoever on my sovereign status in society thereby, nor can there be created any “obligation” to perform in any manner, by the mere use of such words. Where the definition in the common dictionary differs from the definition in the “law” dictionary, it is the definition in the common dictionary that prevails, because it is more trustworthy.
Such compelled and supposed “benefits” include, but are not limited to, the aforementioned typical examples. My use of such alleged “benefits” is under duress only, and is with full reservation of all my natural inherent rights. I have waived none of my intrinsic rights and freedoms by my use thereof. Furthermore, my use of such compelled “benefits” may be temporary, until alternatives become available, practical, and widely recognized.
REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY
I hereby revoke, rescind, cancel, and make void from the beginning, all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, implied in “law” or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, as it pertains to any “tax file/identification number” and/or “social security number” assigned to me, as it pertains to my “birth certificate,” and as it pertains to any and all other numbers, “licenses,” “certificates,” and other “instruments” issued by any and all “government” and quasi-“governmental” departments or agencies, due to the use of various elements of fraud by said agencies to attempt to deprive me of my sovereignty and/or property.
I hereby waive, cancel, repudiate, and refuse to knowingly accept any alleged “benefit” or “gratuity” associated with any of the aforementioned numbers, “licenses,” “certificates,” and other “instruments.” My use of any such numbers, “licenses,” “certificates,” or other “instruments” has been for information purposes only, and does not grant any “jurisdiction” to anyone.
I do hereby revoke and rescind all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, signed by me or otherwise, implied in “law” or otherwise, with or without my consent or knowledge, as it pertains to any and all property, real or personal, corporeal or incorporeal, obtained in the past, present, or future. I am the sole and absolute owner and possess allodial title to any and all such property.
Take notice that I also revoke, cancel, and make void from the beginning all powers of attorney, in fact, in presumption, or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, claiming to act on my behalf, with or without my consent, as such power of attorney pertains to me or any property owned by me, by, but not limited to, any and all quasi/colorable, public, “governmental” departments, agencies or corporations on the grounds of constructive fraud, concealment, and nondisclosure of pertinent facts.
I affirm that all of the foregoing is true and correct. I affirm that I am competent to make this Affidavit. I hereby affix my own signature to all of the affirmations in this entire document with explicit reservation of all my inalienable rights and my specific right not to be bound by any “contract” or “obligation” which I have not entered into knowingly, voluntarily, intentionally, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion.
Trying to file a bid bond against the judge. any information on how to successfully do this would be great!!
Does anyone know the process for determining or finding what the CUSIP number on my Birth Certificate may be? Or perhaps know of someone who does. I would appreciate learning the process. Thanks. Tony
I have tried to find the opinions in the Bond vs. UNITED STATES, 529 US 334-2000 where the judges state that the American People are Sovereign. Would someone please help and direct me to the opinions that state this? Thanks
P.S. Or maybe the other Bond v. US cases would be the more appropriate case opinions for me to review? Please advise
Knowing what I do about the fraud in the Court system, I have successfully beat four separate “Criminal/Admiralty/Administrative” charges in four of the for profit corporation “STATE’S”, just know they do not have jurisdiction of the subject matter, look at the Flag that is behind the judge. Every time I challenge the flag, and their jurisdiction, they dismiss the case, rather than expose the fraud. Absence of the law is the remedy, What Constitutional law did you break?
You have said in your “Great American Adventure” that one only needs to be in Puerto Rico for 3 days and then File and obtain a Divorce….. However as I additionally searched ON-LINE, it says that one MUST HAVE Reseedency in that said ‘Country’ for at least 1 Year….
Has this Time been changed to have Resedency there? Or is there a Hidden aspect that is not so known of a 3 DAY allitted time??
Thanis,
Gary
The Supreme Court case that establishes the people as sovereigns is Chisholm v. Georgia 2 Dall. 419, 454, 1 L.Ed 440,445 (1793)