Noor Bin Ladin
My Letter to America.
Published on NorBinladen
About Noor
Born in Switzerland to a Swiss mother and Saudi father with the most controversial last name of the 21st century, at first glance it isn’t obvious that I would be a freedom loving, Americanophile and patriot at heart.
My background story and early life were recorded in my mom’s bestselling book, “Inside the Kingdom: my life in Saudi Arabia”, by Carmen Bin Ladin. In short, upon realizing that she couldn’t bring herself to raise her three girls according to Saudi culture, she fought a long, harsh battle in Swiss courts in order to gain our freedom and secure our upbringing in the West with Judeo-Christian values.
This clash between my life and how different it would have been in Saudi Arabia had she lost, made me appreciative of our values and freedoms here in the West from early on in my childhood. Travelling to America extensively from the age of three onwards further cemented my gratitude for our way of life and my love for the American way in particular.
Though I have largely kept to myself since the tragic day of 9/11, I can no longer stand by and watch as America burns. A supporter of President Trump since his campaigning days of 2015, I feel compelled to speak up ahead of the 2020 elections, the most consequential in America’s history.
Why? Because the more we are to take a stand in the fight for the Free World, the higher the chance of saving Western Civilization from the brink of collapse. Believe General Flynn when he writes, “When the destiny of the United States is at stake, and it is, the very future of the entire world is threatened.”
As the last stand of true Freedom in the world, the fate of humanity rests on the shoulders of America, and President Trump. Patriots across the globe are watching closely and rooting for their success, as it will be ours too.
A Footnote to Noor Bin Ladin’s Letter to America:
It is easy to make mistakes about who and what we are because there appear to be powerful entities who have used various parts of our and other’s governance to put in place “look alike” structures that are designed to confuse normal people and enrich the families of those deceivers. So I may be mistaken and accept the consequences of my mistakes, please accept my apologies in advance, if mistakes have been made. I am trying to run a real time experiment to clarify the presence of mistakes. It is essential that you do your own research and share the insights to correct my errors if any:
It appears to me that there is confusion in much of what has transpired recently about what it was that the Founders tried to put in place and what was done to cope with the realities of the time that have been maintained or expanded to the present:
1) It was recognized (correctly) by the Founders that the people (living beings as opposed to fictional persons) of this country are, as Noor described them, endowed by the creator as free and equal individuals with unalienable rights that come directly from the creator.
2) From this position of prominence of living people, various levels of governance were created to assure that any governance did not diminish those rights without justification. Also that there were things that needed to be done that required either the collective resources of all the populace or outside assistance (like lawn mowing for an elderly relative). That these “things” could be contracted for through treaties and agreements by the people who collectively contracted for the service.
3) The levels of governance in America have now been turned upside down even as the situation offered in America is still better than in many other areas of the world. This means that the “contacting people” have become the enemy of the “contractors”; that instead of being the sovereign power centers as the Founders assumed, people are now at the base of the power structure rather than at the top. This means that “The people centered government”, sheriffs, towns, counties, States, and Federated States, have been subordinated to or converted to Corporations that were created through fraud. Some of these corporations have been repeatedly bankrupted and reformed to do the “things” that were initially contracted for and much more that has never been appropriately approved or denied.
4) The fraud may have been in place as early as the actions of Alexander Hamilton or before, but the current dramatic power struggle began with the Civil War and the lack of people centered governance there after.
5) It appears that the Declaration of Independence and Articles of Confederation set up the following structure above the county:
a) States were gathered as Assemblies with Nation Powers, but without the ability to act as completely independent Nations in maritime commerce. This was to preserve the integrity of the land based integrity of the collected States.
b) These unincorporated States formed a Confederation called the Federal States, that was a contracting body to get supposedly 19 specific functions performed for the federation. It was called The United States of America, unincorporated. It is claimed that this Federation still exists and is to be located in Pennsylvania.
c) There are two contractors: A Territorial contractor, the British Crown, which provided the bulk of the services with maritime protection as a primary service and with it came Admiralty Law. A Municipal contractor, the Vatican, that was to administer the District of Columbia for international relations. Both “contractors” assumed names that are very similar to the Federated contractor:
Territorial: “the United States of America, Incorporated”
Municipal: “United States, Incorporated”
Interestingly, both contractors are / were under the control of the Vatican, and that the Civil War was a war between “States” which were aligned with one or the other of the “contractors”. But in fact that all wars appear to have been fomented as means for profit by entities associated with these contractors, as opposed to actual conflict to settle particular moral issues???
d) The Confederation was composed of “States” that were reformed after the Civil War as “States of States Incorporated. These new States of States were named in a similar way, Vermont State, became the State of Vermont, Incorporated … Later counties were either abolished as was Hampshire County in the State (Commonwealth) of Massachusetts or as “Hampden County, Incorporated” with look alike names. The residents of the land area were assumed to be (without explicit choice being offered) “citizens” or employees of these new corporations. As such they were called to vote for the officers of the corporations and to be subject to the codes and statutes produced by these various governments.
f) As Benjamin Franklin is claimed to have said in answer to the question of what kind of governance the new country had adopted: “a republic if they can keep it”. A Republic differs from a democracy in that it is a representative form of government rather than mob rule. It appears that we are now being offered the choice again between these two forms of governance and the consequences of these choices that are being carefully hidden in plain sight: 1) short term responsibility for governance of all by representatives from the general public (with no special perks after service) as opposed to, 2) popular acceptance of a hierarchy of selected power elite that then controls the “equitable” distribution of resources (a Democracy).
g) There are many changes that took place after the Civil War that have greatly expanded the power base of the contractors. There are several sources of complementary (or sometimes conflicting) factual research that need much broader coverage, in no particular order:
Aim for Truth
American Intelligence Media
American States Assemblies
State of the National
Operation Disclosure
I-UV
h) The results of various treaties have been formalized in “Constitutions”. There are at least three of them – one for each of the contracting entities. They may look very similar but have very special aspects that are there to confuse the “citizenship” of everyone. It is essential for everyone to sort out where they belong and to work to see that the rights that each is endowed with are protected from the over reach of entities who are not supposed to have the control that they are trying to assert. This can and should be done without violence even in the face of extreme provocation! For this to happen we need to comprehend and support the function of the County Sheriff, the various U.S. Marshals, and the various levels of “Federal” military. We must sort out who is working for people and who are working for corporations to enforce codes and statutes that may not apply to actual people.
None of this is meant to deny the special nature of the peaceful aspects of life in this United States of America, unincorporated. Rather it is offered as a base to do more research and hopefully engage in peaceful correspondence about the implication of all kinds of choices.