BZ: Look at the photograph- What do you notice is different. What have we completely changed over to and so Important symbols of the False construct/The financial Slavery System are GONE..
#UNIVERSALCLEANUP: THE DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT OF 1950, AS AMENDED
to download directly click here
final__defense_production_act_091030
BZ, Please, a little help here-
What was repealed in here?
Was this in 2009?
Thanks, in advance
Hi Kim, I posted it because Trump said he’s cued it up to go into effect if he feels the need. But Pelosie and others are pushing really hard for him to use it… So it made me wonder. Something here, not exactly sure yet. But its published so it will come to one of us and then I can publish that insight. hugs
Section 106…Congress would not want the President to have any authority over energy…i.e. Tesla’s historical inventions being re-purposed in today’s world?
Thanks, BZ.
Seems the fastest reaction by some has been that Section 3 gives power over the economy.
I was looking through the document and the numerous amendments over the years,although one thing that jumped out was in Section 2 (a) (b) (8).
(8) in the construction of any industrial facility owned by the United States Government, in the rendition of any financial assistance by the United States Government for the construction, expansion, or improvement of any industrial facility, and in the production of goods and services, under this Act [50 U.S.C. App. § 2061-2171] or any other provision of law, each department and agency of the United States Government should apply, under the coordination of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, when practicable and consistent with existing law and the desirability for maintaining a sound economy, the principle of geographic dispersal of such facilities in the interest of national defense.
Do these 6 words within the sentence, linked below, not cover it all?
, under this Act [50 U.S.C. App. § 2061-2171] or any other provision of law,
The page I found this was 3 in the beginning. It is on 5 of the pdf.
What I have historically found, previously in many of the “Acts” or word written that Federal, State and Corporate entities have included (in MANY instances quite expensive) has been the phrase: “and for others purposes”.
Yet, it seems here, although a bit different, all inclusive of/for powers with “or any other provision of law”.
ANY.
I would like to see what others think, as I am still learning!
PS
M. Battaglia nice to see you chiming in, I may have gone by your place on the way to GMHA!