#UniversalCleanUp: USA V Tucci-Jarraf
HATJ Doc 107 Motion Ex-Parte seeking subpoenas
to download directly click here
Tucci doc 107
Doc 108 Order of Thomas A. Varlan denying Motion Ex-Parte seeking subpoenas
to download directly click here
Tucci doc 108
Law Office of Francis L. Lloyd Jr.
to download directly click here
Tucci-Jarraf 05-25-18
Why did either Heather or Randy nor refer to Doc. 98 for the Declaration of a Statement of Facts as the reason for the request for subpeona of those witnesses, or was it expected that a Judge of Varlan’s caliber would have realized that the information already existed in the public record? Is it possible that these folks have never read that document or bothered to rebut it in any way?