The Chair of Saint Peter:’There Isn’t a Bankruptcy’ in Detroit Because All Global Debts Have Been Erased
The Chair of Saint Peter - Creditor to Bankruptcy of THE CITY OF DETROIT
Uploaded on Sep 23, 2024
United States Bankruptcy Court
Eastern District of Michigan
Case 13-53846 - City of Detroit
19 September A.D. 2013
Matter: [#493] Notice of Eligibility Objection
Filed by Creditor The Chair of Saint Peter
Presenting the people of the City of Detroit
By Brent Snavely, Detroit Free Press Business Published on
Chair of St Peter leader talks about Detroit bankruptcy: Robert Marques, leader of the Chair of St. Peter speaks to the media after leaving U.S. District Court in Detroit on Sept. 19, 2013. Kathleen Galligan/Detroit Free Press
There was a mixture of retirees, Detroit residents and community activists objecting to the city’s bankruptcy filing Thursday.
Then there was Robert Marques.
In the most unusual argument presented during the U.S. Bankruptcy Court hearing, Marques testified that he was there as a representative of “the Chair of St. Peter” — as in the Vatican.
Marques of Ohio said all of Detroit’s debts were wiped out on June 30 as part of “global debt forgiveness.”
He acknowledged that his legal arguments are unique, but insisted that they are based in fact. He also warned that anyone who doesn’t follow the orders from the Chair of St. Peter could be held accountable for war crimes.
“The City of Detroit, which is a legal fiction, is basically saying there is a bankruptcy,” Marques said shortly after he testified during the bankruptcy hearing. “The problem that most Americans don’t realize is there isn’t a bankruptcy. For one reason: All the world came out of global debt on July 1, 2013, when Iraq sanctions were lifted.”
Marques, dressed in a dark suit and a white tie, was among about 50 people who spoke during the hearing because they filed objections to Detroit’s bankruptcy by Aug. 19. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes held the hearing to give retirees and concerned residents a chance to speak.
The Chair of St. Peter is an actual chair that is housed at the Vatican in Rome and is believed to be a chair that was actually used by Peter, a disciple of Christ.
Marques said, “The Chairman of St. Peter is the Chairman of the Global Estate Trust. He is the Chairman over the Vatican.”
Marques, or his organization, filed a 21-page document with U.S. Bankruptcy Court on Aug. 19 and mailed the same document to a number of local Catholic parishes.
The document arrived in a large envelope with a picture of the city skyline emblazoned on it, said Ned McGrath, director of communications for the Archdiocese of Detroit.
McGrath sent out an advisory to all of the Detroit parishes to alert them to the document.
“To overstate the obvious, I would not encourage any contact with this individual and/or his website,” McGrath said in his advisory to the Catholic parishes.
Marques said he came to Detroit to inform the judge and Detroit residents that the city should not be in bankruptcy.
“We are not here to argue these points. We are here to state them in fact,” Marques said.
In court, Rhodes nearly had Marques removed for reading directly from the document he had filed and for going over the three-minute time limit.
Afterword, flanked by about a dozen followers, Marques declined to say where he lives or how many people belong to his organization.
He also repeated his warning that if the orders of the Chair of St. Peter are ignored, there could be consequences.
“If they do not respect that decision they will not fall under the authority of Roman Curia as public officials as will be held for war crimes and crimes against humanity,” Marques said.
20 Responses to “The Chair of Saint Peter:’There Isn’t a Bankruptcy’ in Detroit Because All Global Debts Have Been Erased”
Very interesting, thanks for posting this.
The last exchange between Mr. Marques and the judge was interesting:
[Court] “Alright, I have to ask you to terminate your statement now.”
[CoSP] “I will not terminate it…..it stands. Thank-you.”
It appears to me the term “terminate” wasn’t being used in the sense we understand to wrap up his statement but in a less clear legal way and the respondent was aware of that.
Given all we have learned from Heather and others about the real meaning of a word we use commonly in the English language versus the legal meaning, I wonder what was meant by the word
Terminate doesn’t seem to be the key here - means pretty much as you would expect.
Hearsay is a statement, made out of court, offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted. The judge seems to want CoSP to stop his hearsay.
it stands: To remain as a thing is; to remain in force. CoSP seems to tell the judge . Ex: to stick it.
Just my uneducated best guess though.
Evidently you don’t understand what “hear-say” means. The fact is the courts may not talk about or recognize “THE BANKRUPTCY” which has been and established as fact since 1933.
The fact is if there is no lawful money and we only dealing with Debt notes. There is no possibility to pay any debt WITH debt. It is not HEAR-SAY it is Fact
What will you all allow your children to be taught in the public Fool system? History is recorded by the “Powers that Control”. They determine what is in the mind-stream of the people by the “entertainment industry which includes the the Internet gaming industry that gets Funded to create jobs for young minds to enter the “work force”. So what is being Taught to our children? WAR? People do not create WARS. BANKS create WARS using quasi-governments like the US CORP to implement their pans for world domination of the flow of capabilities . whereby they control peoples ability to create wealth for themselves by enslavement.
The Bankruptcy question is a distractive tactic to make people believe there is “money” and that the people have/had/lost the ability to payback something that is an impossibility.
There is no money, and hasn’t been any “MONEY” since the CROWN/BANK stole all the gold and silver from the people.
Everything is based on our “Promise to pay” which is done in contracts. But how can anyone promise to pay if there is no way? The only thing worth anything is our signature.- enough for now.
Yep, Chris, I noticed the same thing…
This guy Marques is no fool but where has he been hiding all this time?
We need more like him to come out - maybe he’s one of the first to do so and get the ball rolling.
I also liked the way he handled the questions he wasn’t going to answer after the hearing… With aplomb, you might say.
Alison
I am a member under the chair of saint peter (divineprovince.org) please join us the more people we have the more we can educate in the public governments! from auto tags, to dispauperment certificate (birth certificate showing you are NOT owned) to the court of chancery to file any court cases with against public officers in breach of trust! We make this transition with peace and authority! No authority is stronger than spirit the very creator of governments. That is exactly what divine province is used for, identifying yourself as a spirit. Divine province is a tool to help identify who you are. Nothing can ever Identify a spirit. You must BE the spirit within and understand exactly what and who you are!
I know him. Spent many hours with him on the 4th of July , no less.. He was quite convinced he would be making history this year.
A great example of how the actions of a few, will benefit many.
Excellent! Today, I went to court for a credit card summary judgement and before I even got into court, I was told that it was a requirement for me to fill out a personal financial form, before getting into court. I was also told that I would first be meeting with an attorney representing the bank, prior to court. I asked what law requires me to fill out the form and I said that I felt it was unnecessary, because I planned on settling the account that day (AFV). He said it was from the judge. No justice! I was so disturbed by all of this that I left and did not go to the court. Therefore, I can now be arrested. I do not want to go to jail. I would like this whole situation to just go away. I hope this debt forgiveness thing happens immediately. Much Love, Donnalee
donnalee check out divineprovince.org and quit using STATE ID’s when you are NOT the NAME in all capitol letters. You are a spirit in a body. You cannot have a name! You only have a body! thats it! learn who you are and the people after you will no longer be able to find you. If you are a spirit and police are looking for a name, well that name isnt you. In fact it would technically be false personification for you to Idenfiy yourself with STATE ID’s etc because the name they put on your ID’s isnt yours!
That was great I had also, heard that the gobal debt had been erased. If you can get a hold of the letter from the Pope on google it shows that. Jluy 11 2013
I believe [court] truly was just asking Mr. Marques to stop talking. However, clearly “terminating a statement” - means to abandon your position. Yes words mean everything and Rob did an excellent job!!! Go Rob!
The word terminate, legally speaking, is most often used in the event of a trust being ended. For example, if the legal interest/title and the beneficial interest is commingled, (Say for example the beneficiary gives all beneficial interest to the trustee), everything is combined meaning no longer SEGREGATED. It creates an event which is the end/termination of the trust, and the trustee is out of the picture meaning no longer necessary due to the trust having been terminated.
The “Fiction” Court in Detroit was asking CoSP to “terminate” as (to recall all that he stated as not happening) on the record that was being recorded. The “Judge” knew fully well as to what was being said, and the importance behind all the words. The Judge wanted CoSP to ‘terminate’ (recant) all that he said.
Bravo!
I’d sure love to read it. I don’t assimilate technical information as well as when I read it.
You did a fine job. I was surprised when the judge tried such a silly trick with termination when he could see that you knew what you were doing. I am really proud of you!!
Regarding, “The Chair of St. Peter”.
Trust, but Verify.
Although Mr. Marques sounds confident and well positioned articulating well his position, until I see some verifications of his alluded to ‘standing’, he’s simply another “patriot running off at the mouth”.
I don’t mean this disrespectfully.
It’s just that I have seen so many A4V and other related precesses to have well intentioned folk wind up in jail…..
Yours in Freedom,
ME
In the article above, that follows the videos, there is a mistake, or misrepresentation:
“The City of Detroit, which is a legal fiction, is basically saying there is a bankruptcy,”
“The City of Detroit” is not a legal fiction, it is a natural community. THE CITY OF DETROIT is the legal fiction. When in “all caps” a name, becomes a corporate identity. “Capitalization” is the transformation into capital, or material possession. Marquez rightly differentiates while speaking the words.
THE CITY OF DETROIT is an artificial corporate (LLC, Roman Curia) overlay to The City of Detroit.
The same goes for THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, versus The United States of America. The former is corporate or legal, the latter is natural or lawful.
ETHEL JONES is a corporate fiction. Ethel Jones is an organic human being. Likely female in my estimation.
Legalese is rife with logical pitfalls for laypeople. It is very much a different language. With it’s own unique set of logic and rules. The “judge” tried to trap Marquez into “termination” of his statement. A tactic that Marquez was obviously expecting. Or at least ready for.
“Do you understand?” is actually; do you stand under “my” authority? Answer: No, I do not stand under. I comprehend your offer to contract with me, and as such, I knowingly do not accept, nor agree to, any contract with you.
This weekend, the People will legally have a new temporary capitol for the Republic for the united States of America, as DC has been legally foreclosed and retroceded back to the people of the county/city who originally surrendered their land to be the seat of government.
Location, upper Mississippi Valley, Missouri. In a county where north and south where divided and many men, women and children lost their lives fighting to keep the Union together, and fighting to seceded from the Union. The county has much more history behind it, as does the city the temporary capitol will be located in.
This temporary capitol will be used to conduct the affairs for the Republic during the restoration era, as this location has produced many documents people all over the nation have recently contributed t over the last nine months. So, many, many, many of us thought it best to use this location, as it symbolizes a place where People came together over the phone, over the internet, in person, etc. to unite as one, to construct a plan the People can use to restore a nation the tyrants had turned into a democracy and oligarchy rule.
The Framers over 238 years ago created the Republic, the Framers elected George Washington as President; the Framers did it all, not the People.
This time around, the People will be in charge of restoring the nation to a Republican form of governance for and by the People, not some group of men, not groups gathering and coming together to carry out their private agendas. This time there is a failsafe to prevent this from happening called common law courts/grand jury courts for and by the People.
Under what authority you say are we permitted to do things this way: under the authority of the five natural elements of law, our God given rights as provided in the Declaration of Independence 1776.
“-1) That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, 2) it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and 3) to institute new Government, 4) laying its foundation on such principles and 5) organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
And, in order to secure a republic…. “The united States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.” U.S. Constitution, Article 4, Section 4.
The above paragraph says in order to be guaranteed Union united as States, the Republic must be secured and protected from invasion and domestic violence. Therefore the People must unite militias and minutemen, throughout all fifty States and to assimilate into one force as permitted by the U.S. Constitution ratified March 1819: Ninth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as rights not specifically enumerated in the U.S. Constitution can be further located in the Declaration of Independence 1776; Article 1, Section 8, Clause 12; Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15; Article 1, Section 8, Clause 16 and of course the Second Amendment.
In doing so, a republican armed force can bring forth to justice those the common law courts/grand jury courts for and by the People cannot. In other words, a joint effort of a republican armed force and common law courts, together can accomplish what one by itself cannot.
This weekend the instruction manual to establish common law courts/grand jury courts for and by the people will be released, along with the legal document regarding the temporary capitol for the People for the Republic for the united States of America.
Need minutemen/militias from all fifty States to make this legal. This is a call to unite, not a call to arms, only a call to unite, as arms may or may not have to be raised, is dependent upon the locations of resistance to the Peoples courts.
Email me at: [email protected], in the subject matter, include your state and county. In the email, your name and number and best time to call.
~ Richard W. Sharp, Jr.
Sir, why would you want to make anything ‘legal’? Legal means under Color of Law! The tools attorneys use are statutes, codes, by-laws, regulations, resolutions, policies, etc., none of which have the required ENABLING clause therefore attorneys aren’t even using law when they nonstop steal our property! A law repugnant to the Constitution is void”. — Marbury v. Madison
What matters Sir, is what is Lawful. Are you an attorney? Because the words you use sure makes it sound like an attempt to gain control over people, via ignorance. Either that or you’re incompetent but possibly well intentions. Either way, you’re dangerous. Since you don’t even know the difference between lawful and legal, who invited you to ‘help’ people in this situation? Help like that, no one needs.
Upon further research, I found that Robert is affiliated with this interesting site: http://divineprovince.org/ which offers free membership to read through the documents and access other info. Also here is a clip from some 20/20 coverage on the group: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3G5-9Rqre6E
FYI: webinar on youtube with Robert Marques
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nbJ1phi9Ww