#UNIVERSALCLEANUP : Pacer Docs 219- 222 STANDING ORDER OF ORIGINAL FINAL CALL CLEARING SETTLEMENT CLOSURE OF ALL LEDGERS
published on The IUV, on July 23, 2018
Tucci-Jarraf Beane doc 219
to download directly click here
Tucci-Jarraf Beane doc 219
Pacer Doc-220 -STANDING-CANCELATION-DULY-CANCELED-RE 216-216-1 AND 217
to download directly click here
Pacer Doc-220 -STANDING-CANCELATION-DULY-CANCELED-RE 216-216-1 AND 217
Doc 220-1
to download directly click here
Doc 220-1
Pacer Doc-221 – STANDING DECLARATION OR ORIGINAL EVIDENCE OF ACTORS FINAL COMMAND AND ORDER HATJ
to download directly click here
Pacer Doc-221 - STANDING DECLARATION OR ORIGINAL-EVIDENCE-OF ACTORS-FINAL-COMMAN-AND-ORDER - HATJ
Doc 221-1
to download directly click here
Doc 221-1
Doc 221-2
to download directly click here
Doc 221-2
Pacer Doc 222 STANDING ORDER OF ORIGINAL FINAL CALL CLEARING SETTLEMENT CLOSURE OF ALL LEDGERS
to download directly click here
Pacer-Doc-222 -STANDING-ORDER-OF-ORIGINAL-FINAL CALL-CLEARING-SETTLEMENT-CLOSURE-OF-ALL-LEDGERS
D0c 222-1
to download directly click here
D0c 222-1
Pacer Live Database Docket History – HATJ 07.23.18
to download directly click here
Pacer Live Database Docket History - HATJ 07.23.18
I read this and am trying to understand. It looks like the thing that is different is the notice that the factualized trust is now closed. Is that what we have all been waiting for that will set Heather and Randy free? Or was it the rejecting of the sentence being passed being the final piece of the puzzle? If Heather rejected every single thing, then when the final piece is rejected, does that mean that she will be freed? Or will that happen on apeall? I’m sorry to be so confused, but I want to understand so that I can use some of what Heather does if I ever get in trouble.
This comment is a comment on my ability to comment on anything at this point so I echo Bill’s comment – I do not know what is going on – the text below was placed on Common Good Dialogue today 180725:
———————————
Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf – My Thoughts on the Current Legal Processes in the united States
Legal Function or Lack Thereof and How to Know What is Working?
The following is a comment on a relatively new post about the sentencing hearing portion of the Federal case against Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf for alleged Wire fraud and money laundering. The comment was initially sent to Stillness in the Storm on July 24, 2018, and after reading some additional information I realized that there was much more going on than I was privy to and I suggested that it was not necessary for this to be presented. Remember that most of what I receive is information that I have no direct knowledge of but feel that it may be worthy of being shared. As with all information one must do their own research and until it is fully vetted it is still just information.
——————–
Justin, (Justin Deschamps is the originator of SITSSHOW and works very hard to present things that are not found on the normal news channels)
This is a modification of a comment placed on i-uv.com before the sentencing hearing for Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf. I have changed the details to reflect what I have heard since the 17th of July, 2018, regarding the current situation.
I have followed the discussions of legal technologies and the situation of Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf (HATJ) and her use of UCC filings to modify / change the legal and financial system. The recent (7/6/18) discussion found on your (SITSSHOW) site of the Anti-corruption Society’s understanding of Act 2038 and later acts of FDR with references to M. Stamper’s book, “Fruit from a Poisonous Tree”, makes the point that the UCC is the law of the land not the Constitution. You seem to refute this position without any citations of fact.
The Federal court in the Eastern District of Tennessee is not functioning as if unrebutted UCC filings were controlling legal positions.
If the UCC is law then the work that HATJ did as of 2012 should be recognized, If not we need to know why and identify the other alternatives. There are many other advocates for legal and financial reform but they seem to ignore each other. I believe that you have correctly identified a crucial missing link, the need for deep understanding of the legal system (by everyone) and dependable support for those who try to get the (appropriate) changes to become law.
Is it possible that our current government is so corrupt that it is not the dependable base for such change?
SITSSHOW has included a few comments about TDAs, TDDAs and the utility or lack thereof, but few others have even bothered to recognize HATJs work. You make the point that TDAs, TDDAs, and other entities formed in the name of living humans are there for the use of others and there is no legal way to take possession of these assets within the current legal framework. This contradicts the work of HATJ, Winston Shrout and Anna von Reitz. Where have they gone astray?
You mention that we must work within the system for legal change, but you give no substantive route for this change to happen. I have discussed this situation privately in several contexts and those with governmental experience generally say that it comes down to finding a prosecutor who will take a case and follow it to its logical conclusion, and if that can not happen then it does not matter whether anything has been done right. It appears that this is where things stand – reference the NY Attorney General’s recent resignation as an example of the kind of change that is needed.
Certainly HATJ thought that she had to do something to expose the current situation and that she had done enough to get the bad actors to be publicly identified. This may still be playing out and SITSSHOW has not begun to expose how this all fits together – probably few of us will know until it is all over (if it ever is?).
The recent posts regarding how the Grand Jury was manipulated with fraudulent internal FBI emails show a very disturbing tendency of the legal system to be completely unreliable. HATJ and RBK apparently are to be sentenced and serve out some of their terms of incarceration. There are many sources that say that everything is recorded and we will all be responsible for our words and actions at some point?
Is there anything that can be done to call all parties to account for the apparent lack of transparency and reliability (see Executive Orders 13818 & 13844)?
If what HATJ has done is real everything should be changing here. It is essential that this matter be clarified. There are so many areas of our physical lives that are being held up by the kinds of things that HATJ worked to clear up that it seems most appropriate to wait and see how the facts play out as the time for release of what various bad actors have done approaches. My forestry and rural life in general are on hold until the funding systems are changed to reflect the need for long term proactivity in sustainable situations.
If there is anything that folks like me should be doing please let me know and I will do what I can to add some fuel to the fire.
Alan C. Page, Ph.D., Research Forester
———————————
THE TAKE AWAY FROM THIS:
LISTEN AS A CHILD
GATHER INFORMATION
PAY ATTENTION TO THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN IN THE TRENCHES:
Ben Fulford
John Perkins
Paul Hellyer
Preston James
Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf
THEN KEEP LISTENING FOR LINKAGES
Jul 25, 2018 6:05:58 AM
I read through the document for Washington State, which I think I originally read in 2012.
Was there any lasting impact on the Washington State court system ? Or,
did they go right back to business as usual ?
Clearly, the law that applies to Washington State applies to all states in the union of states.