#UNIVERSALCLEANUP: For Francis- In that presentence report… HATJ
published on The IUV on July 3, 2018
Good Morning Francis:
I received this email for you from Heather this morning:
#UNIVERSALCLEANUP: For Francis- In that presentence report… HATJ
published on The IUV on July 3, 2018
Good Morning Francis:
“fleeing from justice”
Right!! …She borrowed Randys motor home and led police on a 110mph chase barreling through the streets of Tennessee in the motor home!!
Lies, lies and more lies…..
What? Now they’re charging her with fleeing & eluding??? Prayers are with her from so many people. Humanity will be free tomorrow. We’re praying that she will be freed, too.
Guys – this looks a lot like aggravated overexposure to Alex Jones.
That “charge in wa dc of ‘fleeing from justice'” is Tucci-Jarraf’s arrest in this case. She was arrested in DC by the metro police and turned over to the feds for a FRCrP R5 proceeding on the warrant from TNED. No drama, no mystery, no “Lies, lies and more lies”, no “Now they’re charging her with fleeing & eluding???”.
Yah … but in relation to the above email the query is in reference to a presentence report, under a section relating to prior criminal history, and being arrested as a fugitive from justice under a warrant issued in another state is not the same as being “charged” with an offence in the state the arrest was effected. In addition, the fact that in the same entry is a header entitled ‘Disposition’ and whereby the entry under that header is ‘Disposition unknown’ and given the level of detail in the report up to that point it is not credible that whoever wrote that did not know what that disposition was. The disposition was an Order of Commitment to another District.of 8/4/2017 of Deborah A Robinson, purportedly at any rate.
In the context of a presentence report then, the word “charge” used in the context that it is, that does make a difference and could be challenged … if and it’s a big if, one had unwittingly entered into some apparently contractual obligation with some other purported party, through the use of an unlawful and illegal financial instrument, which Heather clearly did not. But if somebody makes an entry in such an instrument, deliberately for the purposes of making something appear to be something it is not, in order to adversely affect the outcome … is that a lie? Or is it a forgery?
lotsolove, without prejudice, keep it fluffy and above all, remember; nothing is what it appears to be. 🙂
… maybe it’s more a case of not enough Q than too much Alex Jones … lol. Q! .. get your ass in gear dear, “down to the last microsecond” … you know that. Love u all. :-*
I’m not sure I understand the above two paragraphs. It can be difficult for a reader to understand a passage when the author of the passage doesn’t understand the subject s/he’s writing about. Still, I’ll give it a shot.
Tucci-Jarraf was wanted on a warrant that was issued as a result of an indictment against her in the Eastern District of Tennessee (TNED). The DC Metro police arrested her on that warrant on July 25, 2017. The “Fugitive from Justice” is just their way of saying that she’s wanted on a warrant from another jurisdiction. The net day they turn her over to the feds, and she is arraigned (FRCrP 40) before M-J Robinson in federal court, and DC Metro has nothing more to do with her. The docket is 17-mj-531. Hence the “Disposition Unknown” – she was never charged with violating any DC law, and DC Metro is out of the picture once the feds take custody.
In any event – probably most important – this incident has no consequences for Tucci-Jarraf. As the PSR says, she has a criminal history of 0. Your entire second paragraph, where you appear to claim that there are in fact consequences, is gibberish. Criminal history of 0 is as low as it gets. By the way, much is exactly as it appears to be.
If you again answer with word salad, make it a Caesar. Hold the anchovies
So we are in agreement then that there was no “charge” in DC and therefore the document in and of itself is a forgery, regardless of any perception that the only adverse consequences arise from sentencing guidleline points, and if someone is jailed on foot of a forgery, then that is a very serious consequence. Although it does not surprise me that lawyers who have been drafting, issuing and entering forgeries on the public record for 40 years to the detriment of their fellow man may have some difficulty comprehending that.
without prejudice, nunc pro tunc and praeterea preterea ?
> So we are in agreement then that there was no “charge” in DC
Yes, we are. Amazing.
> therefore the document in and of itself is a forgery
Well, that ended quickly. The “document” (I think you mean the Presentence Report) simply shows it as the arrest on the warrant from TNED which was issued when the indictment was filed. And even if it did claim that the arrest was a charge separate from the TNED indictment – which it doesn’t – that wouldn’t make it a forgery. Just wrong.
> if someone is jailed on foot of a forgery
I have no idea what “the foot of a forgery” is. More importantly, though, what part of “zero criminal history points” don’t you understand?
> without prejudice, nunc pro tunc and praeterea preterea
tejuncetho witunc aejud tho ancerere, ncere, pre, pro prejudic a pre, proundice, prejuterea pre, pra pretet praejunc prejuncerereaetho
That’s level 2 on the Gibberish Generator. Means just about the same.
Heather was never arrested in Washington DC or anywhere else for that matter. What happened was JTTF, inclusive of FBI Washington Field Office CT-4 and DC Metro Police and others, believed that they had arrested the former and alleged ‘HEATHER ANN TUCCI-JARRAF,’ an artificial person and legal fiction, which may or may not have formerly been the beneficiary of a temporary testamentary trust, or a a cestui que vie trust, or a fide commissary trust, or a foreign situs trust, or a secret trust – in that name.
Unfortunately for everybody, they unlawfully “detained” some body else, and without any authority, without authorization, without jurisdiction and without consent. Therefore the “arrest” of the 25th July, as entered into the said document, was unlawful, illegal and therefore void from the beginning and never actually happened and could not have been entered anywhere as such.
The record further shows that the said “arrest” was made by “Deputy U. S. Marshal Mathew S.’, (surname illegible), on the 26th July. So anyone ringing up Washington DC Metropolitan Police wanting to know what the disposition of that arrest was, in that ‘Docket No.’, of 25th July, 2018, would not have been told that the disposition was unknown, because DC Metropolitan Police, acting in good faith, with no hidden agenda to do otherwise, would have told them straight out that they handed Heather over to the U.S Marshall the following day to be “arrested”, So was that a second “arrest” on the 26th of July or is it the same one or what?
So the entry in question as a bare minimum is incorrect, misleading and prejudicial, amongst other things and since Heather and Randy both identified themselves repeatedly on the record from the beginning, and since there is absolutely no dispute by anyone as to the validation and verification of that lawful and legal standing, identification, authority, title, rights and ownership of property, then whoever made that entry knew and had to know that that status was unrebutted in its entirety as and from 1972, and that therefore there was no authority, authorization, jurisdiction or consent to make any such entry whatsoever, by anyone.
See: https://tinyurl.com/y8srf7m4
Fortunately, Heather rejected that Offer to Contract (the alleged presentence report) for lawful due cause and entered it to the record, which really, in a bizarre kind of way, protected everybody involved from harm. So the document in question, the subject matter of this thread, which was formerly a purported and unlawful, presentence report, lacking authority, authorization, jurisdiction or consent, and as entered in Doc 197, and as published elsewhere on this website, in actuality, is a duly verified Due Rejection of Offer to Contract.
See UCC, Article 3, Part 5 – Dishonor. – https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3
all the best for now,
with love,
without prejudice, nunc pro tunc, praeterea preterea and ab initio.
more food for thought…..for all the ‘anal’ysis butts out there???
——————————————————————————————————————————————–
It’s a fact that millions were accepted as 39 million was transfered by Randall Bean. The general rule of the UCC 4A says that after a bank wire is accepted IT IS NOT REVERSIBLE. See UCC 4A-210(D)
Rejection of Payment Order-
“Acceptance of a payment order precludes a later rejection of the order. Rejection of a payment order precludes a later acceptance of the order.”
https://budgeting.thenest.com/time-frame-reversing-wire-transfer-33881.html
Can a Transfer Be Reversed After Being Accepted?
Once a wire transfer has been accepted by the recipient’s bank, there are only a few circumstances that allow for the reversal of the wire transfer under the Uniform Commercial Code. The only available options for reversing a completed transfer are if the sending bank made a mistake, if the payment order was a duplicate of a previous order, or if the order is for an amount greater than the beneficiary was entitled to receive under the transfer. In those cases, the beneficiary’s bank will recover the funds improperly paid to the beneficiary.
Let’s analyze this.
(1) Did the sending bank (The Federal Reserve Bank) make a mistake on the transfer of 39 million dollars to Randall Bean which would have been several mistakes? No, no mistakes could have been made to that degree and not that many mistakes as both the sending bank and receiving bank accounts are verified before sending as that’s the generally accepted practice on “bank wires”.
2) Was all of those wire transfers, duplicates? No, that was never alleged by the government or the banks.
(3) Were the orders in amounts greater than the beneficiary was entitled to? I suppose that the government or the bank might say yes. However, how do you explain the transfer of 39 million in several bank wires if the recipient of those funds wasn’t entitled to it? That would be a very weak argument in conjunction with how the wiring of funds practice really works of verifying funds before they are sent: Banking Handbook on EFT’s (electronic fund transfers): http://www.nctreasurer.com/fod/Resources/BankingHandbook.pdf
p. 21 “Some agencies receive a large volume of EFT or wire deposits, and in this case an agency may request the establishment of a dedicated bank account for its dedicated use. Such account is also considered a “zero balance account” (ZBA), providing for the total of all deposits made to the account on a given day, to be automatically “swept” to a DST account. At the end of the banking day, the bank shall provide the agency access to online reporting to view the individual EFT deposits credited to the account.”
p. 38 Counterfeit warrants
“Questionable items will be brought to the agency’s attention on the day of presentment in order to determine if the item is valid or not. An immediate response is required of the agency, in order for DST to act upon the presentment timely. An advice will be provided the agency for all items returned.”
p. 49 Transactions pertaining to wire transfers
“Once an STP (Straight through Posting) transaction is authorized by the agency, and the effective date is entered as the current date, the posting takes place immediately with the status becoming liquidated
p. 50. “CB$ will not allow a negative funds transfer transaction to be initiated. CB$ Reference Number assigned by system when initiated (12 digits with first four digits being year).”
When a wire transfer is made from one bank account to another, both account holders are verified. Additionally, the amount of money in each account is verified, so there are no charge backs associated with wire transfers. See link: http://tinyurl.com/7v4jtp7
So it’s obvious the government filed false charges against Randall Bean as the bank and the Federal Reserve had no right to reverse these wire transactions and the bank lost the ability to reject the payment orders since they waited beyond midnight of the next banking day to reject these bank wires. As a matter of fact, they accepted these bank wires according to their own records.
My question is why is this information I provided not in Heather & Randall’s defense? Why did they not argue the UCC? And why did they not put these arguments in the court record?
I’d be glad to answer, but I’m apparently no longer allowed to post here. The words of a lawyer with 40 years of experience, most of that in the federal courts, are apparently not welcome.
UCC remedy has nothing whatsoever to do with ‘law’. It is Administrative Remedy. “Law” is the argument of Statutes which is the cause of the problem in the first place seeing as there are no more Article III courts in this country.
Its just like saying that the Federal Reserve system is under ‘oversight’ by Congress.
When is the last time that Congress has overruled anythig that the FRB has done? Never mind that it is a Private Bank altogether which ‘members’ can own stock in.
And btw, you just posted, so apparently you, and I are still allowed to post here.
lol .. stop whingeing. All are welcome here, as long as they have a bit of respect. 🙂
Speaking as someone who once worked for a Federal Reserve Bank, and knows the banking system a bit, I have just one point about that entire post.
It’s wrong.
The transactions involved were not wire transfers, the were ACH transfers which are a very different thing, and the Federal Reserve Bank did not send any money to Randall Beane, it rejected the attempted transfers when they were presented, because the accounts they were attempting to draw from didn’t exist.
The money that was credited to Randall Beane’s accounts at USAA for $29 million (you got the amount wrong, too) were credited by USAA in anticipation of a successful debit from the account he entered into their system, which did not at the time verify transactions at the actual time of attempt, but not until the next batch of accumulated transactions were submitted to the ACH system the next day. Randall Beane did the digital equivalent of writing a bad check at a grocery, where the grocery doesn’t know the check is bad until their bank returns it to them. You still got to take the groceries home because they trusted you. Randall just did it on a much larger scale, online.
I have constantly wondered how come people cannot seem to grasp that the place you enter your account and routing number online to make payments is not the place where the payment is made from, your bank, and the merchant, insofar as they are letting the transaction process further are doing so on the trust that you aren’t trying to defraud them. Just like the grocer who takes your check and lets you take dinner home, they sometimes let you get away with one, as happened here.
The loss from this case was USAA, and was limited to the amount that they allowed Randall to transfer from his pending CD purchases, to cashing them out, and transferring the proceeds to his checking account and pay off his auto and consumer loans. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York didn’t lose dime, because as soon as it was presented to them they rejected all of them.
That’s the truth. We’ll see if my posts are allowed to be posted, As Wes has said on another site, the ones who call us censorers and cry that we don’t allow the truth, are the same ones who never let our posts here see the light of day.
Not buying it, my friend. There is just NO WAY.
Next thing you’ll do is deny it’s a private money system…..
Such huge amounts of $1M a pop would have set off red flags, and would have
been dealt with immediately if they were not completely valid.
But the large withdraws went on for a period of days…….
During which time the story was concocted out of thin air (just the way
FRNs are created) of “1 digit off from SSN, which was a Ginnie Mae account”.
A Ginnie Mae account is NOT A MATCH to RKB – clearly. And it
would have kicked out – and not been allowed. Only matches
(name and account #) are allowed. That is ironclad logic.
$29M IS the correct total amount, and it’s ridiculous for any
logical person to believe that “error” would be allowed to stand for
several days. It is a large amount, and he was even able to
cash out pending CD purchases, AND buy a $500K vehicle.
Your post strains my credulity – by a very wide margin.
I’ve heard this ACH argument before, and I did not buy it then, and am not buying it now.
Let’s just see what happens.
Yeah, I guess you’re right. If what I was saying was the way it really works, Randy would’ve been made to give the money back, they would have seized the RV and he might even have been arrested.
I mean, if what I say was true, he could be a convicted felon and they’d put him in prison or something, for sure.
Thinking further, he;ll they could even charge Heather with helping him if that was the way it worked, she might even get arrested, too.
So obviously, you’re right, and I’m wrong.
You know what the problem of “movements” like this is? You never listen and rarely allow people who actually know what they’re talking about to try and gently correct you. Eventually, we start losing patience and give up the gently part and just try to tell you the truth for you to take or leave as you please.
You ignore anything or anyone that disagrees with you, or you censor it so people don’t even see it, and your original idea that was honestly a simple misunderstanding is fed with increasingly wrong ideas to justify why you’re right, and each explanation is a just a little farther from the truth but more importantly starts getting detached from reality and soon you’re saying things that to people outside your censored little communities makes you look batshit crazy, and yet you persist in telling the world that YOU and ONLY YOU know the truth and those of us who disagree are the uninformed. Now, you’ve become the Elite Ignorants and the experts have become “experts” not to be trusted. We’re misled, or misleading everyone, all to cover up the vast and secret actual truth, known only to your enlightened elders.
This is how you, who I’m guessing ended your legitimate study of the banking system, the mechanics of it, the creation of money, how international banks interact with each other and business, all of that, you learned what you know (that is factually correct) when you opened a passbook account with your paper route money when you were 14 years old. Yes, this is how you feel confident in telling me how it works, and the rest of your little circle chants “Go get ‘Em, Bryan” to you and think you’re showing me, all without knowing much of who I am or what I know. That is a very dangerous game, one that Heather and Randy played here and lost badly.
Far be it from me, who did work at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland many years ago, who has a MS in Economics from the London School of Economics, a Doctorate in International Business from another pretty good school, to tell you, whatever it is you do, that I might know a little bit that you’re obviously confused about. As I said, circumstances instant tend to show that maybe I’m more right than you are.
These accounts do not in any way exist, you’ve been told by me, the banks, the central banks, the FBI, several Courts of Law and every merchant whom you’ve tried to pay your bills with using them. I double dog dare you to show me one single transaction that cleared using your TDA account or other ”secret” account to which you have never contributed and the Federal Reserve or some other nefarious government or Illuminati Banking Cabal nominally controls. Its never happened, or never happened where a little investigation reveals it as a mistake or the person who said so is confused or lying about it.
Because, I can show you literally thousands of times its been attempted and failed, each time costing the person who tried it more in fees for nothing, often driving them out of the market for normal banking and into the exploitative world of check cashing joints, wire service bill payments and payday loans. I can show you hundreds of cases of people who tried it and had to at the very least go explain to a Judge of some kind what they were thinking and the elephant in the room here of course, Heather and Randy just days away from finding out how many YEARS they’re going to spend in Federal Prison, because they just kept believing that they knew better, and us experts have been lying to them.
I have just one last question. If ANYONE would know how to do this correctly, how to access my secret accounts, I think I’d be him. I have all the evil-bankster cabal credentials, Ivy League undergrad, LSE, Federal Reserve Bank, bank of England, I’m not a Freemason but I have been to China. So, theoretically, I should have billions at my fingertips, all I have to do is move it on over to my personal account and start buying cool stuff, and I don’t have to settle for an RV, I know how to fly so I’d get a Jet, a nice little G-5 would do nicely. But I don’t. I don’t even work in the nice, cool secret banking offices anymore, I have, for the last few decades chosen to instead monstrously hot, noisy and stressful auto plants. Building cars, 12 hours a day, at least 6 days a week and right now I’m in the middle of a new product launch so my NEXT scheduled day off is Thanksgiving Day. Why would I do this?
Really, tell me why I bother. For the piddling amount of $20,000 month? Granted, I make pretty good money, and my bonus the last 9 years has been more than my salary, so I am making some bank here, but its nothing compared to what I should have for the asking, and certainly makes me look crazier than people accuse you of being for thinking I’m doing it for the LUL’z.
Anyhow, Y’all might consider broadening the places you’re looking to for answers, because it doesn’t seem to be working out so good for you, and people like me who you call crazy seem to be doing just fine.
I never said you are crazy – I just disagree with you.
Do you deny the FRN is private money, with a middleman
who leaches every transaction ?
A partial remedy is redeemed for lawful money – mentioned
in Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 – and codified
at 12 USC 411. Problem is this remedy is not well known at all.
Gee, that’s probably because the banks own the media.
Also, I do not care what the system says about this case. We are
seeing that the FBI is very corrupt – many have been fired. The banks
have an axe to grind – as does the whole entrenched system.
The courts, as we’ve learned, are just another division of the banks.
Hypothetically that’s fine, but there’s no evidence whatsoever of that ever happening in this “case” and when you say Randall Beane, who exactly do you mean? Is it this Randall Keith Beane? Or not? – https://i-uv.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Trust.pdf
Whichever one is in prison awaiting sentencing.
Oh … you mean the one who does not appear on any alleged “indictment”? That Randall Keith Beane, is it? Or not?
Interesting. See my two posts above? The one timed at July 6, 2018 at 6:30 am was actually submitted well before the alien6 post. I submit it, check back, and instead of seeing the usual “this post is awaiting moderation” there is no sign of my post at all. Submit again, same thing happens – it just disappears. I tried again when I submitted the short post about being, well, unable to post; then I see the “awaiting moderation” message. Maybe I wasn’t banned – but, if not, there is a glitch in your software.
Anyway, to the alien6 post: a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Yes, UCC art. 4A deals with acceptance and rejection of payment orders. Yes, once a payment order is accepted (or rejected, for that matter) that decision is final. But that doesn’t mean that a thief – Beane – gets to keep the ill-gotten gain. Nothing in the UCC (or anywhere else) says that. The purpose of the finality is to freeze the situation so as to fix the responsibility for the resulting loss, if there is such. Look at the other sections of art. 4A. § 203 deals with how certain payment orders are unenforceable. § 204 deals with a bank’s responsibilities should a payment order be unauthorized. § 205 sets responsibility for erroneous payment orders. The other sections cover other situations in which someone, or some bank, would suffer a loss. All of this would be that much more complicated if a bank could simply call “do-over”. Hence § 210, which forbids that. None of this amounts to “Beane gets the money”, and certainly none of this amounts to giving Beane a license to steal.
So why wasn’t any of this brought up in court? Because it has nothing to do with guilt or innocence. The jury decided that Beane took something that wasn’t his, and that Tucci-Jarraf conspired with him in so doing. The things that you cite don’t come close to saying that they should get away with it.
RKB is NOT a thief. The account in his name is his SSN.
In the alleged trial they tried to hide this fact.
Why are those accounts even there, and why are they funded ?
> Why are those accounts even there, and why are they funded ?
They aren’t, and they aren’t.
See how easy this is?
Wrong, wserra.
They are, and they are. The accounts are there because of the UCC filings.
You are correct – it’s easy. The fraud is clear to me and easy to understand. We have been harvested,and we are still being harvested of our energies and essences through the private money system. We who the govt is supposed to serve are harvested by this fascist govt. That makes ZERO sense…..
What’s difficult is people who are fans of the fraud and the slavery.
“It’s been this way for more than a hundred years – let’s not change anything –
we are used to being slaves – Gee (MMMMAAAAHHH), I kinda like it”.
I guess you are a fan of the slavery system – not surprising
since you are a bar card member.
British Accreditation Registry = BAR. I guess we never really
kicked King George OUT in 1776. Of course, the British sovereign reports to the
pope. There is a pecking order even with MORDOR.
> The accounts are there because of the UCC filings.
You, like Bill Clinton, have an issue with the verb “to be”. You can’t go to any bank (or any other financial institution) to get access to these “accounts”. You don’t receive any statements, by mail, email or carrier pigeon. You can’t use them as collateral to borrow money. If you try to withdraw from them, you go to federal prison. I guess it depends on what “are” are.
> We have been harvested,and we are still being harvested of our energies and essences
> through the private money system.
Not to mention pollute and impurify our precious bodily fluids.
> I guess you are a fan of the slavery system – not surprising since you are a bar card member.
Nope. Don’t have a bar card, never have.
> British Accreditation Registry = BAR.
Only in particularly fevered imaginations. In the real world, being a “member of the bar” just means being a lawyer.
> There is a pecking order even with MORDOR.
Dibs on Sauron. I’ll settle for Aragorn if Liv Tyler is part of the deal.
I can tell you now matey, and with all due respect, that you really have no clue as to what exactly is going on here. But I do know that you do have it within you to see it for what it really is …eventually. That’ll be a hard nut to swallow when you do “get it”, considering your background, But you’ll be ok, and life will never be the same again, thankfully. 🙂
> I can tell you now matey, and with all due respect, that you really have no clue as to what exactly is going on here.
Oh, I think I do. Tucci-Jarraf will spend 4-5 years in federal prison and Beane will spend 5-6 years in federal prison, because they tried to steal a lot of money. They would never have succeeded, because “TDA accounts” don’t exist in the form you believe them to.
> But you’ll be ok, and life will never be the same again, thankfully.
The sun will go dead first.
Yeah, we’ll see, wserra.
If what you say comes to pass, then DJT did not really
mean what he said in EO 13818, and he double crosses his allies.
But I do not think that is the case, not yet.
EO 13818 does not mean what you seem tho think it means.
You forget that one of the main arguments for the Gvot. was to prove that “TDA accounts do not exist.”
Obviously now, that is fiction. They most certainly do exist.
Whether or not Beane got to keep the money is irrelevant.
We could go on an on and on, and it would prove nothing as nothing can be proven unless two or more parties agree on it. But that is a Spiritual argument. There is only one Law, and that is Gods Law. All other “laws” are man made Statutes created for the enrichment of evil ‘entities’ to keep people enslaved. All “statutes” are revenue generating statutes, and justice for the victim is merely a byproduct of their enforcement.
AS I am sure that you know that all “citizens” are all considered “enemies of the State” and that Proclamation has never been declared null and void or otherwise rescinded.
Just as Im sure that as an attorney, you are well aware of the Credit River decision, when the only judge who had the b@@ls to render a decision against the banks somehow died some months later.
Anyway, that the TDA accounts exist has now been proven. Others will come along and as Ive previously said, build on their work…….as Trump continues to “drain the swamp.”
Its all a Spiritual info war now and the ptb are losing and continue to lose and once the Federal Reserve is out of business, everything based on it will be….and that includes BAR lawyers as well….wont be any need for them, unless one chooses to contract with them.
> You forget that one of the main arguments for the Gvot. was to prove that “TDA accounts do not exist.”
Well, let’s see. Beane is charged with five counts of wire fraud and one count of bank fraud, in violation of 18 USC § 1343 and 1344, respectively. Tucci-Jarraf and Beane are both charged with conspiracy to launder money, in violation of 18 USC § 1956(h). If you want, I’ll quote you the statutes. Neither of them contains “TDA accounts do not exist” as an element. Even if you believe that the govt had to prove that – which it didn’t – I guess it succeeded, since 24 people indicted them and twelve people found them guilty.
> Whether or not Beane got to keep the money is irrelevant.
Yes, that’s true. A fraud need not succeed to be criminal.
> nothing can be proven unless two or more parties agree on it
Are you serious? Do you really mean that I can’t prove the Pythagorean Theorem unless you agree?
> There is only one Law, and that is Gods Law.
That’s certainly what the Ayatollahs in Iran believe.
> AS I am sure that you know that all “citizens” are all considered “enemies of the State”
Pardon the laughter. Is that more of “God’s Law”?
> Just as Im sure that as an attorney, you are well aware of the Credit River decision
I actually am, but not as a lawyer. I’m aware of it as something that has been cited repeatedly in places where folks don’t know the difference between fractional reserve banking and counterfeiting. If you would like to see what real courts think of it, take a look at https://mn.gov/law-library/legal-topics/copy-of-credit-river-case.jsp
wserra : We have all been born into a totally unlawful private money system. Federal Reserve Notes are private money. That is why the remedy of “redeemed for lawful money” HAD to be written into section 16 of the federal reserve act of 1913, even as amended in 1933 when all the gold was seized.
We have also been press-ganged into “US citizenship” from our births – which means we are considered employees of the “Govt” Services Corp. We were unknowingly registered through our birth certificates – and that is fraud. This was never intended by any of us – we never knowingly volunteered to be property of the US Corp “Govt” . At 8 USC 1101(a)(21), the natural born political status is described as “American State National”, which status is not a “citizen” at all. But, they want to say that we volunteered as citizens – when we were never given full disclosure. Even when we point the fraud out – there is no easy way out of it.
The OPPT UCC filings have lawfully “undone” this fraud.
I’m waiting to see what happens on 7-17.
> We have all been born into a totally unlawful private money system.
I think I need to better understand your use of “unlawful”. I have some trouble understanding how something created by law is “unlawful”. Unconstitutional, yes; I don’t agree, but I understand the words. But if you said “unconstitutional”, you’d have to support the claim with the provision of the Constitution that it violates, and with law supporting your interpretation of that provision.
> Federal Reserve Notes are private money
Once again, I have trouble understanding how you use common words. What is “private money”? FRNs are by law legal tender. 31 USC § 5103. It is a strange kind of “private” that, by law, must be accepted in payment of debts.
> The OPPT UCC filings have lawfully “undone” this fraud.
See my reply to you, above.
> I’m waiting to see what happens on 7-17.
Don’t bother. If the sentencings happen that day, Beane and Tucci-Jarraf are both being sentenced to federal prison. If they are again adjourned, they are both being sentenced to federal prison on the last adjourned date. That’s what happens to people who try to steal large amounts of money from banks.
I have an opinion and that is when the swamp is drained, all lawyers should be hanged, as they are the one’s who have enslaved us all.
Nope, the lawyers just helped us bankers make it look good. 🙂
(technically, I’m not a banker anymore and haven’t been for over 20 years, I build cars now, still, once an illuminati, always an illuminati.)
Really glad u turned up; because ur sidekick was beginning to get more than a little obnoxious, upsetting some of the party guests and it was almost as much as I could do not to show her the doorway, with an admonishment to never darken it again. Happily you bailed her out, or even better, bailed us ALL out, metaphorically speaking of course.
When u say u are always illuminati, does that mean they can bring you out of semi-retirement as it were at any moment should your particular skills be required to conduct some vital errand or another, which only you could perform?
It is of course delighful that you build cars. I know a man with 3 of them and a brand new 40 foot recreational vehicle as well, which he would dearly love to be having fun with. Unfortunately he has been unnecessarily delayed and much worse besides. Maybe you knew, but I do have a 1991 Silver Mercedes Benz 190E, manual, petrol, blue upholstery, tinted visor and sunroof and could be brought back to tip top condition without a great deal of expense. Unfortunately due to unforseen and unnecessary delay, it hasn’t quite happened yet. Although a good feeling that it’s about to happen any moment is now stirring within. So glad i didnt sell it. Such an uncouth.gesture, even in partial destitution, hovering on the breadline.
All i want to know is yes or no mate? Is it really necessary to wait till the 17th … and let Heather loose on foreign agents if that’s what they insist on being, so that everyone can save face in some way or even kind of possibly “get away with it” somehow, maybe, without taking full responsibility for it?
Because a lot of people really did cause a lot of other people a lot of grief, even if they weren’t entirely aware of what exactly was going on. Not to mention the ones that did. Shall we all just stand around in a circle and point the finger at everyone else untill we all fall down in fits of laughter at the ridiculousness of it all?
Unless of course everyone is illuminated, and always was, in which case all that is required is to confirm entry of judgment and order of dismissal with prejudice as of 22nd day of January, 2018 and we can ALL finally put an end to this sordid little uh … wager, and go home. It’s been over for quite some while already as u may be well aware.
I’m not really bothered if anyone else takes responsibility for their actions or not, that’s up to them. There’s no going back now, for anyone, one way or the other. A very wise man once said to me, in inimitable, east london, cockney, not so rhyming, slang. “If you’re not going to help gerrout the way!” Can’t say fairer than that; as the woman said.
all the best for now. 🙂
lotso’love
Alien6 : Let’s not forget that Trump issued EO 13818.
I do not think HATJ remaining imprisoned is a done deal.
HATJ claimed in her 1-22-18 Praecipe the TDDA “OP”
was done to help POTUS.
I do not think she would lie about that.
So, I do not know what to expect on 7-17-18.
> You forget that one of the main arguments for the Gvot. was to prove that “TDA accounts do not exist.”
Well, let’s see. Beane is charged with five counts of wire fraud and one count of bank fraud, in violation of 18 USC § 1343 and 1344, respectively. Tucci-Jarraf and Beane are both charged with conspiracy to launder money, in violation of 18 USC § 1956(h). If you want, I’ll quote you the statutes. Neither of them contains “TDA accounts do not exist” as an element. Even if you believe that the govt had to prove that – which it didn’t – I guess it succeeded, since 24 people indicted them and twelve people found them guilty.
IF the TDA accts. ‘dont exist’ please explain then what was deposited in his account??
YOU are a good lawyer. Dont take that as a compliment. Lawyers are paid to never answer a question directly, but to redirect focus for the jury to another area to obfuscate truth. I should really be adressing you as an ‘attorney’. Look up the root origin of that word. To a “turn” or to twist; the truth of course.
Anyway, Ive gotten from you what I came for. I can agree that you are either a shill or a troll, pardon my ignorance of the strict definition of this word.
No matter, as Ive said, when the fiat Fed Res banks will soon be out of business, as they say, all accounts will be settled.
And the proliferation of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency are seeing to this as I speak.
And if you are a real person and these are your real beliefs, and not just as a shill, then I feel sorry for you as your life, along with many others like you is going to get really, really difficult in the months ahead. I say if, because as a Spiritual person, I am well aware of someone (me) being tested, to actually find out if they (I) really do believe in what they (I) say. In the world that we live in, everyone is always testing everyone, but Im ok with that because I really believe in what I speak and have had some practical real life experience with it.
Also, I suggest that you try reading the book entitled A COURSE IN MIRACLES to help ease your transition, if it is still possible. Time has grown very short for those who have not upgraded their Spiritual frequency, and it may be too late for some. Or perhaps even try the Clifs Notes version of it, THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE UNIVERSE.
Good point : from where did RKB get the $29 million, if the TDAs don’t exist ?
Yes, the system claims he used an account # “1 digit different” than his SSN –
which the system says was a Ginnie Mae account.
Well, since Randy Beane is NOT Ginnie Mae, that would also be a mismatch.
The transfers were done over several says, while the system tried to
figure out what to do about RKB withdrawing his own value.
[Are we really supposed to believe the system erroneously gave RKB $29M
over several days ? NO WAY.]
The system came up with the “1 digit different than SSN” story, which was a Ginnie Mae
account. Not a very strong story – an obvious lie to a logical person.
> IF the TDA accts. ‘dont exist’ please explain then what was deposited in his account??
Y’know, I wasn’t at the trial, but I understand at least some of the people here were. It’s unclear to me why I should be digging through the trial transcript to answer the questions of people who were there.
On the first day of testimony – January 23, 2018 – one Monica Alcala, a representative of USAA Bank, answered this very question. She testified (pp 128-130) that on July 3, 2017, Beane added a funding account to his USAA account. The routing number for the account he attempted to add was to the Federal Reserve, followed by his own Social Security number as the account number. He then proceeded to rack up the charges. She testified that, since USAA Bank deals with veterans, they will credit immediately, not waiting for the funding bank to actually transfer the money. If you look into the nature of ACH (Automated Clearing House) transfers, typically they do not clear immediately in any event, and most banks will not allow immediate withdrawals. USAA is different because, as Ms. Alcala testified, “It goes back to we try to take care of our members who are active military, so we try to take care of them as fast as possible.” Unfortunately for USAA Bank, some of their members are more trustworthy than others. Beane fell on the wrong side of that line.
So: electrons were deposited in that account. USAA Bank allowed them to be withdrawn as dollars because they trusted someone who turned out to be a thief. As they also found out later, their ACH batch-sending system was subject to an exploit, since resolved, that delayed triggering awareness that funds were not available. As a result, USAA Bank will have to make good for whoever lost money. And they are in that position because the funding account – the one with the Fed routing number – didn’t actually exist.
I don’t guess you saw the emails between USAA and the FBI that were
excluded from discovery ? USAA and FBI coached each other with the story
of “1 digit different than SSN”, and other parts of the story. They
did not want the jury to know the truth that the TDA accounts exist, and
are funded. Not just with electrons, but with value. Value enough
to cash out pending CDs and buy a $500K SUV.
The other thing is if the account was not valid it would have been an
immediate kick-out. Say whatever you want – it’s OK. This is entertainment.
A man who withdraws his own value cannot be a thief.
The thieves are the ones who commandeered his value in the first place –
without his knowledge or consent.
> I don’t guess you saw the emails between USAA and the FBI that were excluded from discovery ?
You’re right, I didn’t. Please post them, or supply a link if they are already posted somewhere. I’d be interested to see if I agree with your characterization of them.
> The other thing is if the account was not valid it would have been an immediate kick-out.
Why, because you say so? As I posted above, there was considerable testimony at trial about why that was not the case. The jury obviously accepted that testimony over that of Beane and Tucci-Jarraf.
Of course the TDA accounts didnt/dont exist silly!!!
How do you think that Randall paid for the motor home?
With Bananas of course!!
The Fed depoisted 29 Million bananas in his fruit basket account! LOL!!!
Of course, a lawyer would say, define “money” and define “bananas”.
Only a lawyer could a/turn and a/twist what the meaning of words are!!
Maybe the lawyer could look up in the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 27 Section 72.11 entitled “When all Crime is Commercial”
Course, he will explain in Latin that the Code really doesnt mean what it says….it says whatever a lawyer wants it to say….
As the return to Common Law approaches there are going to be a lot of a-turn-ees paying their hefty law school bills slinging Latte’s at Starbux.
> How do you think that Randall paid for the motor home? With Bananas of course!!
Well, no. With stolen money. With money that he got from USAA Bank by linking a fake funding account and taking advantage of ACH delay combined with USAA Bank’s goodwill towards veterans (now ended, thanks to Beane) and a hole in their verification procedures (now fixed).
> Maybe the lawyer could look up in the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 27 Section 72.11 entitled “When all Crime is Commercial”.
Well, I can certainly look that up. The first thing to note is that the section begins, “As used in this Part”. “This Part” is 27 CFR Part 72, entitled “Disposition of Seized Personal Property”. Is that what we were talking about here?
The second thing to note is that 27 CFR 72.11 is not entitled anything like “When all Crime is Commercial”. It is actually entitled “Meaning of terms”. Your phrase doesn’t appear anywhere in that section. Here, look: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/27/72.11
> Course, he will explain in Latin that the Code really doesnt mean what it says….it says whatever a lawyer wants it to say….
No, I wouldn’t say anything like that. I would say that either you’re lying or you can’t read.
You still never answered the question; (nor do I expect that you ever will) what was deposited in Beanes Account that allowed him to obtain the motor home? (or perhaps he just got in with the keys and drove off) I’ll even make it easy for you, seeing as your a lawyer.
a) USD
b) bananas
c) oranges
d) apples
e) none of the above
f) all of the above
alien6 – You forgot “Electrons” in your multiple choice question.
wserra, You sound as if you have not read the INITIAL OPPT INVESTIGATION done by a team led by Heather, this was an AUDIT of the world bank where Heather and team saw the CORRUPTION and the running of the worlds slavery system, this is how Heather knows THESE ACCOUNTS EXIST
and why they were all FORCLOSED. I don’t know if you realize that MONEY is just a conversion of HUMAN energy and that we HUMAN BEINGS are the only source. If not you have a lot of reading to do. By the way HEATHER was once an LAWYER, she ripped up her card when she saw all the corruption.
NOEL : It is clear these folks do not give up easily.
I’m not sure what’s going on.
HATJ was on the paradigm project, which uncovered that
“there are no loans” from Fed Res “Banks”. A loan cannot be
a loan of “credit”, it must be from “capital” – and it never is.
Interest is reward for taking risk on capital, but not in the
case of the Fed – they have zero risk. So the call for “restitution
to USAA” is a completely ludicrous statement. Loss is not
possible when you create money out of thin air – it’s a joke.
HATJ shut down the entire court system of a county in
Washington State. That is not easy info to find – we can
never forget who owns the media. But she did do that…..
The phrase “Federal Reserve Bank” is 3 lies in 3 words :
1. It is not “Federal”, it is private,
2. There is no “Reserve”, and
3. It s not a bank – banks loan out capital – the Fed
creates loans out of thin air.
And the above is a textbook example of what it means to (not) answer a question when your a laywer.
IE, “what was deposited in the account”?
Not how, where, fed clearinghouse, etc, etc,
But “what was deposited”?
Was it……US Dollars, US bananas, US oranges, US pencils, US onions, US neckties, Apple Mc Computers, what ?
Wish to redirect your honor, but “what was deposited”?
No wait. It was the dealers fault. He gave Beane the motor home for free. Actually, nothing was deposited and so Beane paid nothing for the motor home. Nothing from nothing leaves nothing. -0-
Yeah, alien6, those electrons can buy some pretty
cool stuff !!!! LOL.
I am pretty confident our validation will come soon now,
as PFM seems to believe. 7-17 will be interesting.
Great wserra, You state the account did not exist. How was money transferred from this account to Randy’s if it is not his ? These accounts are in OUR NAMES if they are not ours, then a crime of impersonation has been committed against us.
This secret accounts thing is such a first-world notion, and I’m sure many of the people who keep talking about draining the swamp and thwarting the evil banksters have never actually seen true poverty or even been out of their own country. One should realise that more than 2 billion people on earth do not actually have bank accounts, let alone access to the internet. Think of the 15 million street beggars in India alone, the countless people living hand to mouth in parts of Africa and dire rural poverty in China just to name a few examples. They certainly don’t realise that there is an account in their name just waiting for them to access!
That is exactly why the banking corruption needs to end.
If it ends in one place (Knoxville, TN), it will end EVERYWHERE.
Yes, there are people worse off than those in America.
But, if we can end the private money corruption here,
there will be domino effect to help everyone, everywhere.
I’m also told it even extends beyond this planet – not sure about that.
Laura, your right ! how could they know without the internet, you have the internet and you don’t know neither. It comes down to using the internet to educate yourself, we all would not know, if it was not for the internet. We know these accounts exist as Heather led an investigation into the World Bank, where she found out about the slavery system been run and all the corruption going on. Why do these accounts exist in our names ? Why do they have the same number of our Birth Certificates ? Why were we never told of these accounts in our names ? Why have people accessed these accounts previously, many have paid off debt.
ANYONE who enters a claim against another MUST provide evidence of the claim. IF evidence of the claim is not provided, the claimant is a criminal.
People who have the ‘responsibility’ of being in the ‘justice’ system NEED to put in a cage for doing criminal things !
Bryan says :
July 10, 2018 at 1:38 pm
alien6 – You forgot “Electrons” in your multiple choice question.
——————————————————————————————————————————————————-
lol!! Yes, you are correct!! Cannot forget good ole US Dollar electron equivalents as no physical cash is exchanged!! And in a few years or so, it will all be Bitcoin and/or cryptocurrency electron equivalents!! Good bye Fed Res and Trump is helping it along by enacting US Tariffs on Chinese made goods. This is not about ‘taxing’ china, it is about breaking the back of the Fed Res. AS China is ‘taxed’ with Tariffs, this will have a huge effect on the USD, as China basically funds the govt. by purchasing Yuuuuge (as Trump would say) amounts of US Treasury Bonds, NOtes and Bills. So when the new $200 Billion tariff begins next month, China will in effect be sending all USD back to US and t then we have to either go to a new currency, (cryptos) or continue to eat all the USD until inflation goes to 25-30% which will kill hte economy.
Yes alien6 –
I am not exactly sure of everything that goes on.
I only know we have been badly ripped off by a
private money system for more than 100 years, and today
we endure pure fascism. Our fascism is probably worse and
more advanced than what existed under Mussolini in Italy.
HATJ has exposed it the best she could. If she stays in
prison after 7-17, that will give new meaning to the
expression “No good deed goes unpunished”.
HATJ set it up such that the slavery systems end,
and everybody wins. But for certain ones that is not
good enough, I guess. They are taking advantage of
the fact that many do not understand what “private money
system” means, or the ramifications of it.
They were clever to set up such an elegant and subtle
slavery system. Even with it exposed on the record, they
aim to continue on, apparently.
I thought HATJ was being sentenced today. Is that not the case?
7-17-2018 was what I heard – unless they move it back again.
It was moved back from an early June date.
It seems highly unusual to be sentenced 5 1/2 months after
being found guilty. Not sure what that really means.
Sentencing to occur coincidentally with the big Trump/Putin meeting/summit.
Perhaps it will be postponed again.
No matter, the end of the fiat currency slavery system is at hand. People are waking up to what has been going on. Heather is one of a long list of freedom fighters who have dared to take on the beast.
Those like….Winston Shrout, Jerry Kane, Kurt Johnson/Scott Heinemann and many, many others.
What is going to put the final nail in the coffin is the use of cryptocurrency. Of course, one could say that the Illuminati have also prepared and planned for this as well, because of the Illuminate sponsored periodical, “The Economist” predicted a (biblical?) One World Currency way back in…….1988. So what did they know? …or plan from way back then?? So go figure….
Also internet sites are talking about some type of “major economic announcement” in October 2018. So you can be sure that its not the monthly jobs data report. lol!
Google “Economist magazine 1988” or simply go here: https://steemkr.com/bitcoin/@freetherobots/is-bitcoin-the-new-world-currency-1988-article-prophecy
HATJ is a LOT MORE than just another in the line.
HATJ actually knew what she was doing, along
with Charles Miller and his original Perpetuity filing.
HATJ is a great lawyer, and has lawfully closed down
the system, whether they wish to recognize it, or not.
Clearly the enforcement is not “Honor”, because the people
not recognizing the foreclosure have NO HONOR, nor do
they have clean hands enough to acknowledge they have
been successfully challenged INSIDE THEIR OWN SYSTEM –
which they never believed could EVER happen.
Well, they never though DJT would defeat their PIG, either.
They would rather shut their eyes and pretend it didn’t happen.
7-17 will be interesting.
HATJ is doing a wonderful job, but there really have been others at this “game” for quite some time now and they have not been successful because, as they have done wiht HATJ, the govt. has lied, cheated, and done everything possible to keep justice from the people. I have been at this “game” myself for since the advent of the internet and books like “Cracking the Code” have been around, and victory was never possible because they would not allow it.
With all due respect, it has nothing to do with “knowing what you are doing”, as there have been plenty of us who have, (including the names Ive mentioned in a previous post) but knowing what one is doing is irrelevant when the govt. cheats, lies and just simply does what they want to do and ignores evidence. And if that is not enough to stop someone, they will simply have them killed. So, how does knowing what you are doing prevent that from happening? It doesnt.
If you want to go way back, you could say that Pres. Kennedy “knew what he was doing” when he was attempting to revert back to silver backed currency and abolish the Federal Reserve. What did that get him. Well, you already know. So while knowing what one is doing certainly is a must, it is not the only operative one needs to succeed. Ultimately, it is timing and the stars must be aligned correctly, and they are all aligning correctly with each passing minute. Do not underestimate this being the year of Jubilee either as not having a significant impact on events. In the end, all these matters including finance are a spiritual war, not a physical one. So victory will come when the timing is right and it will also have the strongest spiritual impact on the greatest number of people.
What I want to know is what were USAA Bank and Federal Reserve at Bank of New York doing ‘owning, operating, aiding and abetting unlawful and illegal private money systems, issuing, collection, legal enforcement systems, operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS against states of body without said states of body’s knowing willing and intentional consent;’ … including ACH and FedWire Systems, in July of 2017 … when their charters were cancelled?
https://i-uv.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ucc-declaration-of-facts.pdf
Paul Mc :
Apparently there is no enforcement, or nobody
is willing to step up and enforce the lawful UCC filings.
That was the problem with the Courtesy Notices, too.
I know EO 13818 is in place, but will it be used ?
It seems to me DJT should utilize it with HATJ/RKB.
I don’t see how it would hurt what he’s doing – if
he frees everyone from slavery. That would make him
right popular, don’t you think ?
And what would the media say if DJT did that ? I think
the media would be silent. Will they say “shame on DJT for enforcing
the end of the the slavery systems” ? I don’t think so.
He already pardoned the Hammonds a couple days ago……
Yeah, I’m not sure what happens next.
If DJT does nothing here, then I think we need to consider
that he may not be for the people, as he says he is.
This is the enforcement, 😉 it’s just that its so polite its almost imperceptible. Somehow I don’t think H is hanging around waititng for somebody else to do it for her. If you think about it nobody else could have done it, she kind of had to be there. In another way, everyone has to do it for themselves so to speak, just as you do in any other form of life endeavour. Waiting for the cavalry has an air of helplessness about it and reeks of disappointment, because the suckers hardly ever turn up.
I’m sure if Trump was going to get involved, he wouldn’t just go steamrolling into a court case notwithstanding any Executve Order. Especially one as delicate as this. He’s not exactly stumbling and bumbling along from what I can gather. No, a lot more graceful than that perhaps.
But there are other “parties of interest” you might say. The Robinson family letter mentions military intelligence. Personally I’m not aware of anything they may or may not be doing or even if they are aware of what’s happening here. But they are of course..
The situation as it stands now has enormous potential for unexpected outcomes, it could all collapse on a technicality .. .for example. Or some other event, but you’ll never know until they’ve happened. Expect the unexpected. All ways. What might Q say to you … “trust the process”? Sounds reasonable to me.
😉
Paul –
You are saying what HATJ has been doing, is enforcement ?
Well, I’d have to say it’s not being recognized yet, seeing
as how they still have her and RKB in a cage….. Polite, or not –
the authorities are not returning the politeness HATJ is displaying.
I’m not waiting for the cavalry, but victory in her case would be victory
for all – or must we all got to jail for a year if we try to tap
our value even after she wins ? How long can they pretend that
they are not foreclosed ?
What is your opinion about 7-17 ? You said expect the unexpected.
My expectation is her release – I work on that in my own
spiritual way – which I may mention after it happens.
I fully believe she will be released 7-17, for my own reasons.
The world is a MUCH stranger place than most realize,
without going into details on why I say that.
yes love yes 😉
here you go
EO 13842 Regarding the Establishment of the Task Force on Market Integrity and Consumer Fraud
https://i-uv.com/universalbackdoor-executive-order-regarding-the-establishment-of-the-task-force-on-market-integrity-and-consumer-fraud/
iI is enforcement yes, foreclosure, yes. recognized yes. true value never eludes, always have it you have. expect the expected, yes. believe, yes. mystery yes. Yes Love Yes.!!! 🙂
Btw- As far back as 10+ years ago, Kurt Johnson/Scott Heinemann attempted to use UCC process to eliminate mortgage debt. Here is the govt. side of the story, but like HATJs case, it will not detail where the G lied and cheated to win their case agaisnt the defendants. I am extremely familiar with this case, having followed it as closely as we are now following HATJs case, and the govt used every trick in the book to nail them. They are currently still in Federal prison. Yes, scientia est potentia, and knowledge is power, but not when the govt. cheats.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1530383.html
Yeah, well. Those folks did not foreclose them/end their charters.
The HATJ case is completely different, because they have been foreclosed
with UCC filings.
There should be no “govt” stepping forward to cheat anymore.
We’ll see what happens in 4 days.
I’m just not sure the DJT train is up tp speed with HATJ.
I guess it does not matter they were given 5+ years to get up to speed.
The ball was dropped on purpose of course – just as happened on 9-11-2001
to avoid planned changes on 9-12-2001 brought about by the Perpetuity.
True, they did not foreclose like HATJ did, however they had proved their case and the FBI lied in their case as well.
In fact, they are apparently considered such a grave threat to the govt. that they have been held as ‘political prisoners’ since the end of their ‘trial’ and are still being held in a CMU, or Communications Management Unit; or aka ‘secret prison’. Its the worst, virtually little on no communication to the outside via, telephone, email, letters are read/monitored and sometimes not even forwarded, hardly any attorney/client privilege an virtually no visitation rights. A virtual ‘Guantanamo bay’ for ‘paper terrorists’ as the govt. refers to them. They had trained for years for to attempt this task, when the govt. lies and cheats, it doesnt matter. They have the guns and weapons.
Take the case of Jerry Kane for instance. He was becoming very successful in transferring the Trustee on mortgage documents which allowed borrowers to own their house free and clear without paying the rest of their mortgage. He became so successful in fact, that the govt. felt that he had to be stopped. They were not very successful in preventing from continuing to hold seminars teaching homeowner how to do this, so they “arranged” for him to be killed by being set up to look like he fired on a sheriff. Just put “Jerry Kane shootout” in a youtube search box. Trust me, Ive been at this as an observer and participant for almost two decades and Ive seen it all. There is not an ‘alternative process’ that I have not heard of and have at least rudimentary knowledge of, or in some cases extensive knowledge; accepted for value, 1099-OID, UCC-1 liens, secured party agreements, ens legis ALL CAPS corp names, etc, etc,
Just pray that HATJ is let go and not sent to a CMU prison as we will never hear from her again.
TED talk on secret CMU prisons in the USA (one of which Kurt Johnson is being held)
https://youtu.be/xuAAPsiD768
All I can say is we’ll know more on Tuesday.
But, if HATJ is “excited for Tuesday”, then so am I.
I have a really good feeling about Tuesday. This AM
as I visualized her release – it felt very natural and positive –
more than it ever has. Just saying – the emotions were very positive.
I’ll be surprised if we don’t get a positive outcome.
These corporations have been foreclosed since late 2012 –
I think that works very much in our favor – somehow.
How long can they continue to pretend they still have charters ?
Also, HATJ is the brilliant legal mind behind OPPT. I’m sure
she has had about enough of being in a cage away from her family.
*** All that said, I have no idea what will happen – not as a certainty.
However, if we do not get a positive result Tuesday, I will just accept
it like a Zen Buddhist (Eckhart Tolle). What else can we do ?
Life is in many ways an illusion, and it is definitely a divine game.
Well, if HATJ is excited, then thats a good thing. Hopefully everything will turn out positive.
Sooner or later, there will be a breakthrough. As Ive previously said, Ive been down this road many times and I do feel that we get closer each time..
Also, there was a man named Alvin J Hansen I beleive who had filed a 3 Trillion dollar UCC lien on gov. entities around 20 or so years ago and of course there was no way to enforce it. But you can google Alvin J Hansen (not the economist) and also add “Pennibanc Trust” to the googe search and you can see some who have been at this for decades now, whom newcomers to this process arent even aware of.
Here is just one of many regarding Hansens filings
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&ved=0ahUKEwj_4pumjqTcAhXnxFQKHbj0CdEQFghPMAU&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.portland.indymedia.org%2Fmedia%2F2013%2F03%2F422326.doc&usg=AOvVaw1IM8cw9DQwJpltUfhV9dt5