I https://i-uv.com

  • Home
    • “Meetups” and Connecting with Your Soul Groups
      • Contact Sister Sites
  • OPPT Absolute
    • OPPT Tools
      • OPPT FAQ
      • The Foreclosure Flyer
      • OPPT Courtesy Notice
      • OPPT CN Guidelines
      • Which Courtesy Notice?
      • Cover Letters for CNs
      • Translations of Courtesy Notice
      • Public Interest Courtesy Notice: Monsanto
        • Public Interest Courtesy Notice: IRS
        • Public Interest Courtesy Notice: Chemtrails
        • FREEdom Flyer
    • OPPT Tool Complete
    • OPPT Goes Public
      • OPPT Definitions
      • OPPT Press Releases
      • Conversation with Heather & Brian
    • OPPT Initial Investigation
      • Original OPPT UCC Filings
      • OPPT Financing Statement July 25 2012
      • OPPT True Bill UCC Filing
      • OPPT Commercial Bill UCC Filing
      • Declaration of Facts
      • OPPT UCC Filings in CNs
      • The One People’s Public Trust (OPPT): Your Frequently Asked Questions…ANSWERED
      • E_Call Supporting Documents
  • I UV
    • HATJ: Trust ~ ALL ON!!!
      • Documents for Proof of Ownership for Funds
      • TDDA : Testing spread sheet
    • I and the UV Exchange
    • Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf : I AM WITHOUT PREJUDICE
    • The Will and The Word of I
    • I UV GIFT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED
  • Media and News
    • Nova Earth News
    • Radio Shows
      • The One People Radio Show
      • The Collective Imagination
      • The Transitioning Radio Show
    • Show Transcripts
    • Radio Interviews
  • Freedom Stories
    • Share Your Freedom Story With The World
    • Checklist for Some BEing and DOing
  • Removing The Veil
    • Banking Industry Quarterly Reports
    • Our Cosmic Community
      • Friends in ‘High’ Places
      • Share Your Stories of Friends in ‘High’ Places
  • I UV Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Gold Meditations

Monsanto, EPA Seek to Keep Talks Secret on Glyphosate Cancer Review

by BZ ⒾAM Riger / Tuesday, 31 January 2017 / Published in Absolute Data

Monsanto, EPA Seek to Keep Talks Secret on Glyphosate Cancer Review

By Carey Gillam, U.S. Right to Know,  on January 24, 2017

The EPA is a taxpayer-funded, public agency and its dealings with Monsanto should be subject to public scrutiny, particularly given the widespread use of glyphosate herbicide products and the ongoing international debate over the safety of the chemical. (Photo: Joe Brusky / Flickr)

The EPA is a taxpayer-funded, public agency and its dealings with Monsanto should be subject to public scrutiny, particularly given the widespread use of glyphosate herbicide products and the ongoing international debate over the safety of the chemical. (Photo: Joe Brusky / Flickr)

By Carey Gillam

Monsanto Co. and officials within the Environmental Protection Agency are fighting legal efforts aimed at exploring Monsanto’s influence over regulatory assessments of the key chemical in the company’s Roundup herbicide, new federal court filings show.

The revelations are contained in a series of filings made within the last few days in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California as part of litigation brought by more than 50 people suing Monsanto. The plaintiffs claim they or their loved ones developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) after exposure to Roundup herbicide, and that Monsanto has spent decades covering up cancer risks linked to the chemical.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs want the court to lift a seal on documents that detail Monsanto’s interactions with former top EPA brass Jess Rowland regarding the EPA’s safety assessment of glyphosate, which is the key ingredient in Roundup. Monsanto turned the documents over in discovery but marked them “confidential,” a designation plaintiffs’ attorneys say is improper. They also want to depose Rowland. But Monsanto and the EPA object to the requests, court documents show.

The EPA has spent the last few years assessing the health and environmental safety aspects of glyphosate as global controversy over the chemical has mounted. The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) declared in March 2015 that glyphosate is a probable human carcinogen, with a positive association found between glyphosate and NHL. Monsanto has been fighting to refute that classification.

Rowland has been key in Monsanto’s efforts to rebut the IARC finding because until last year he was a deputy division director within the health effects division of the EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs, managing the work of scientists who assessed human health effects of exposures to pesticides like glyphosate. And, importantly, he chaired the EPA’s Cancer Assessment Review Committee (CARC) that issued an internal report in October 2015 contracting IARC’s findings. That 87-page report, signed by Rowland, determined that glyphosate was “not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.”

The EPA finding has been highly valued by Monsanto, helping bolster the company’s defense against the Roundup liability lawsuits, and helping shore up market support for a product that brings in billions of dollars in revenues to the company annually. The EPA’s stamp of approval for the safety of glyphosate over the last few decades has also been key to the success of Monsanto’s genetically engineered, glyphosate-tolerant crops, which have been popular with farmers.

But the handling of the CARC report raised questions when it was posted to a public EPA website on April 29, 2016 and kept on the site for only three days before being pulled down. The agency said the report was not final and that it should not have been posted, but Monsanto touted the report as a public affirmation of its safety claims for glyphosate. The company also brought a copy of the report to a May court hearing in the Roundup litigation as a counter point to the IARC cancer classification. Shortly after the CARC report was removed from the EPA website, Rowland left his 26-year career at the EPA.

Plaintiffs’ attorneys have asked to depose Rowland to learn about that situation and other dealings with Monsanto. But, along with Monsanto’s objection to releasing the documents that relate to its conversations with Rowland, the EPA has specifically refused the deposition request, saying it would “not clearly be in the interests of EPA” to allow attorneys to question Rowland about the cancer review and interactions with Monsanto.

Monsanto has so far turned over six million pages of documents through the court-ordered discovery process, but has designated roughly 85 percent of the information as “confidential,” meaning plaintiffs’ attorneys must black out information from those documents in any court filings that could be accessed by reporters or other members of the public. That designation is improper for many of the documents, especially ones dealing with the company’s interactions with, and influence attempts over, EPA officials, plaintiffs’ lawyers argue. 

The lawyers say that the documents obtained through discovery show that “Monsanto has been confident all along that EPA would continue to support glyphosate, whatever happened and no matter who held otherwise.” According to the court filings by plaintiffs’ attorneys, the documents show “it is clear that Monsanto enjoyed considerable influence within the EPA’s OPP, and was close with Mr. Rowland… The documentary evidence strongly suggests that Mr. Rowland’s primary goal was to serve the interests of Monsanto.”

The EPA is a taxpayer-funded, public agency and its dealings with Monsanto should be subject to public scrutiny, particularly given the widespread use of glyphosate herbicide products and the ongoing international debate over the safety of the chemical, they claim.

“The health and safety of millions of U.S. citizens is at stake,” states a Jan. 16 plaintiffs’ filing. “Decisions affecting the public health should not be based on secret conversations between Monsanto and EPA officials. If Monsanto wants to advocate on behalf of glyphosate to EPA employees, they should have to do it publicly, so that concerned citizens have equal opportunity to advocate for their health and the health of their families. This issue is too important to allow Monsanto to improperly influence the EPA, and then hide such communication behind an improper ‘confidential’ designation.”

“The health and safety of millions of U.S. citizens is at stake. Decisions affecting the public health should not be based on secret conversations between Monsanto and EPA officials.”

Monsanto is adamant that its documents not be made public, arguing that releasing them would be “premature and improper.” Allowing public dissemination “of a few select internal corporate documents taken out of context… would be prejudicial to Monsanto and could cause reputational harm,” the company’s attorneys wrote in their response.

The plaintiffs’ attorneys say at least four specific documents they have obtained are clearly in the public interest and “illuminate that one of Monsanto’s chief business strategies is its secret and untoward influence on EPA.” The documents include both internal memos and email chains, according to descriptions of the documents.

“Since Monsanto’s communications with the EPA remain secret, these known lobbying efforts are only the tip of the iceberg of Monsanto’s collusion with the EPA. Monsanto’s bad acts in violating U.S. regulations through secret communications with the EPA should not by rewarded by allowing them to keep these communications secret by merely stamping them ‘Confidential,’” the plaintiffs’ attorney state in the filings. “These documents summarize communications with EPA which are not elsewhere memorialized; they are not trade secrets and the public has a compelling interest in disclosure.”

Monsanto argues otherwise, saying the four documents at issue “contain sensitive, non-public commercial information, relate to a motion seeking to obtain discovery from a non-party, and bear only a tangential, at best, connection to the questions at issue in this litigation; hence, any public interest “is minimal.’”

U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria, who is overseeing the Roundup litigation, is expected to rule on the matters within the next few days.

In a separate case, Monsanto and California environmental regulators face off Jan. 27 over plans by state regulators to list glyphosate as a carcinogen. The state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) said it would add glyphosate to its list of known carcinogens after the IARC classification. Monsanto has sued to prevent the listing. The upcoming hearing takes up OEHHA’s motion to dismiss Monsanto’s lawsuit.

Carey Gillam is a veteran journalist and research director for U.S. Right to Know, a non-profit consumer education group. This article first appeared in the Huffington Post.

 

Share
  • Tweet

About BZ ⒾAM Riger

What you can read next

Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America 4.13.21
Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America 4.3.21
The Right View with President Donald J Trump and Lara Trump

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow ~ I UV Blog
enter Primary email:
Must confirm email for Success

Delivered by FeedBurner

Share What You See

Share
Thank you for your exchange of value with us
If you find value in the I UV website & blog , enjoy the content , and appreciate the energy put into it for you, please consider returning some energy by making a donation.~ BZ

Updates

  • #UNIVERSALCLEANUP: HATJ & RKB Alleged Trial Transcripts w RKB Closing Statements
  • #UniversalCleanUp: EO 13818 & Letter from the President to the Congress of the United States
    • Quantum Playground: #HATJ #POTUS : “Universal Clean Up” & “Universal Backdoor”
  • Current Updates HATJ & RKB
    • Eastern District TN Court updates
    • Knox County Sheriffs Office Inmate Manual 2018
  • IRS Secret Manual for Agents 1982
  • Court Registry Investment System- CRIS
  • I and the UV Exchange

Recent Comments

  • The🌈NOW🌈Team on HATJ: Consciousness, the greatest (internal/eternal) security “system” in existence
  • Becky on Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America 4.3.21
  • Suzanne Wasilik on HATJ: Consciousness, the greatest (internal/eternal) security “system” in existence
  • Malissa Phillips on #UNIVERSALCLEANUP  #HATJ & RKB Emergency Formal Grievance Complaint and Investigation Demand 3.11.2021
  • David Mitchell on FOR WE WRESTLE AGAINST THE RULERS OF THE DARKNESS — Crrow777
  • Angie Lindsley on #UNIVERSALCLEANUP  #HATJ & RKB Emergency Formal Grievance Complaint and Investigation Demand 3.11.2021
  • LH on #UNIVERSALCLEANUP  #HATJ & RKB Emergency Formal Grievance Complaint and Investigation Demand 3.11.2021

Recent BEing & DOing

  • Quantum Playground
  • Expansion Meme
  • HATJ
  • Absolute Data
  • Abilities
  • Eternal Essence Embodied
  • Disclosure
  • Creative Arts
  • Freedom Stories
  • Removing the Veil
  • China Virus Unmasked
  • Deep State-Illuminati
  • Satanic Ritual Abuse SRA
  • Sex trafficking

Removing The Veil

  • HATJ: Trust ~ ALL ON!!!
  • OPPT Absolute
  • The Slavery System
  • Banking
  • Chemtrails
  • #UniversalCleanUp :History of Banking
  • Modern Money Mechanics
  • Top Secret Banker’s Manual
  • #UniversalCleanUp : Money & Banking Dallas
  • I Bet You Thought
  • Your Strawman
  • Clinton Body Count List Infographic

Archives

www.i-uv.com all content © Eternal Essence Embodied ©2020

TOP