#HATJ : Pacer Doc # 101 HATJ & RKB STANDING PRAECIPE 01-23-18 and Docs 100, 102

by / Tuesday, 23 January 2018 / Published in Absolute Data, HATJ

 

#HATJ : Pacer Doc # 101 HATJ & RKB STANDING PRAECIPE 01-23-18 and Docs 100, 102

published on The I UV, on January 23, 2018

 

 

 

 

Pacer Doc # 100 – ORDER TO STRIKE PRAECIPE 01-23-18

to download directly click here

Pacer Doc # 100 - ORDER TO STRIKE PRAECIPE 01-23-18

 

 

Pacer Doc # 101 HATJ & RKB STANDING PRAECIPE 01-23-18

to download directly click here

 

Pacer Doc # 101 HATJ & RKB STANDING PRAECIPE 01-23-18

 

 

Pacer Doc # 102 HATJ & RKB PRAECIPE AND NOTICE OF STANDING NOTICE AND FILING OF STANDING DECLARATION 01-23-18

to download directly click here

Pacer Doc # 102 HATJ & RKB PRAECIPE AND NOTICE OF STANDING NOTICE AND FILING OF STANDING DECLARATION 01-23-18

 

Pacer Live Database Docket History 01-23-18 1 46 PM PM est

to download directly click here

Pacer Live Database Docket History 01-23-18 1 46 PM PM est
Share

11 Responses to “#HATJ : Pacer Doc # 101 HATJ & RKB STANDING PRAECIPE 01-23-18 and Docs 100, 102”

  1. Jennifer says : Reply

    Love and Compassion to those who continue to choose to DO and BE as they are. Each choice point is recorded and will have to be reconciled by each/ALL. The taking of full responsibility may appear painful from one perspective yet continues to shine the Light and make ALL transparent. ALL is PERFECT. I feel ALL that are present and ALL are in support of this transparency in their chosen roles! Holding space in LOVE. ???

  2. Bill T. says : Reply

    Can someone who understands what Heather is trying to do help me out? Document #98, which Heather filed last night, was rejected. The judge said that defendants can’t issue orders in a case. That makes sense not just in the de facto courts. If we bring back de jure courts, if you let defendants order the court to free themselves, then nobody who commits a crime like robbing my house would ever have to answer for their crimes. It shouldn’t matter whether it’s the corporate/admiralty courts or the restored people’s common law courts, letting defendants just get out of being prosecuted with a simple filing makes any court meaningless.

    And she’s just saying the same stuff again. If she keeps saying the court has no jurisdiction and the court keeps rejecting it, shouldn’t she be trying something else? Heather used to be a B.A.R. lawyer until she saw the light. So you would think she would know a lot of different ways to win, not just challenging jurisdiction the same way over and over.

    I keep trying to understand what she’s doing and I can’t figure it out. Is Heather just too smart for the rest of us? I hate to sound like a broken record, but I am not seeing how this is helping her free herself and Randy. Never mind about how this doesn’t seem to be helping prove that the treasury deposits exist, which will miraculously transform all of our lives.

    • Tallison says : Reply

      The court is corrupt and operating in fraud because they haven’t issued nor can they prove jurisdiction. HATJ can do this as many times as needed the way I see it. The judge is refusing to allow evidence for the defendants. Corruption!

    • Dan Carpenter says : Reply

      She is letting the court hang itself with its corruption. They have no jurisdiction yet keep claiming they do. They have rejected the incriminating documentation in doc 98 which is spelling out the corruption. 2 DOJ on behalf of Sessions on behalf of POTUS are witnessing the event in the courtroom and further exposing themselves.

      Heather has provided an ‘out’ for them yet they refuse to acknowledge for fear of exposure as they continue to to expose themselves anyway.

  3. Jeanice Weber says : Reply

    So what became in the court on this day 1-23-2018 Just wondering , Is it being thrown out?

  4. james says : Reply

    Being there is no lawful government, being the constitution delegates the authority to a public servent and prohibits a private mostly foreign owned corporation from being empowered to one day being a servent and the next serving itself to own the land. This is why the private business a alleged Court, has the same power as 7-11 it has no power to make any orders to do business with it, unless one makes the choice to contract with it. That is the facts the truth and nothing but the truth. If it had the delegated authority it would be on the public record and it would be as easy as showing a drivers licence of the document certified by congress.

  5. Chris says : Reply

    Rule 201 – Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    (a) Scope. This rule governs judicial notice of an adjudicative fact only, not a legislative fact.

    (b) Kinds of Facts That May Be Judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it:

    (1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or

    (2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.

    (c) Taking Notice. The court:

    (1) may take judicial notice on its own; or

    (2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.

    (d) Timing. The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.

    (e) Opportunity to Be Heard. On timely request, a party is entitled to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the fact to be noticed. If the court takes judicial notice before notifying a party, the party, on request, is still entitled to be heard.

    (f) Instructing the Jury. In a civil case, the court must instruct the jury to accept the noticed fact as conclusive. In a criminal case, the court must instruct the jury that it may or may not accept the noticed fact as conclusive.

  6. I find that I cannot understand, from a layman’s point of view what is happening exactly. It seems to be good news but the legal jargon is a bit over my head. Thank you for the sacrifice that you are making for humanity.

Leave a Reply

TOP