Doc # 87 – UNITED STATES PRPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS 01-17-18

by / Wednesday, 17 January 2018 / Published in HATJ

TNCOURTDoc # 87 – UNITED STATES PRPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS 01-17-18

BZ: In a circumstance where an alleged case were to unfold HATJ & RKB can suggest changes, new questions, modifications, deletions… to the questions, the judge holds final decision and the judge reads and asks all questions from both sides to jurors.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doc # 87 – UNITED STATES PRPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS 01-17-18

 

to download directly click here

Doc # 87 - UNITED STATES PRPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS 01-17-18

 

 

 

Share

8 Responses to “Doc # 87 – UNITED STATES PRPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS 01-17-18”

  1. Joseph says : Reply

    They wish for ‘fair impartial trial’, yet they’re filtering the jury to their own parameters?

    Not cool.

    If the information by Heather and others is correct, why would the government have any hand in publishing or confirming it? Conflict of interest.

    We’re watching…

  2. Joey says : Reply

    Rejected…my gosh….even I get this at this part of the play. No signatures…no energetic stamp ….hmmm

  3. Joey says : Reply

    I am interesting to see what everyone elses energetic thoughts are on this…cannot wait

    exciting…

  4. Tallison says : Reply

    This is so corrupt it smells foul! More transparency! Their desperation is really showing now.

  5. Bonnie-Lee; Boden says : Reply

    I am curious as to what aspect of employment the fed witness has at the FRB. And, I was quite surprised to read them saying that circumstantial evidence holds the same weight under the law as direct evidence.

  6. Tony says : Reply

    Their questions should ELIMINATE Everyone,..so they wont be able to seat a jury,…Is that a mistrial ..? Have you or anyone in your family ever had a negative thought about Authority !….Excused…Have you or anyone in your family ever felt like the Gov, was abusing you,.! Excused, !

  7. Tony says : Reply

    Ive never seen a Jury Instruction before, Is this even close to what a normal case would read like ?? Really seems like they are straining anyonethat reads You Tube, I think they are quite worried, maybe unprepared for this curve ball, But Really,..Do I know anyone who has ever been prosecuted, ? They must be looking for the Blind , Deaf, Mute government employees, to put on the jury,..

  8. Dave Roberts says : Reply

    These questions are called “voir dire” that allow both sides to find out the knowledge of the prospective jurors. But bear in mind, just answering yes/no to a question doesn’t exclude you from the jury. Both sides are allowed to exclude a certain number of potential jurors. This case allows 6 exclusions for the prosecution and 8 for the defense. These are normal questions that can be asked.

Leave a Reply

TOP