#HATJ- Final Notice Praecipe and Rejection Notice Fillings

by / Tuesday, 17 October 2017 / Published in Absolute Data, HATJ, OPPT Absolute

original

 

 

 

 

#HATJ- Final Notice Praecipe and Rejection Notice Fillings

 

 

 

Rejection Without Dishonor- to Response

to download directly right click here

 

rejection-w-outdishonor

 

Rejection Without Dishonor- to Order

to download directly right click here

rejectionwout-dishonor2

 

 

Praecipe – Final Due Notice

to download directly right click here

praecipe - final due notice

 

 

Notice and Declaration of Statement of Assessments, Reconciliations, and Settlements

 

to download directly right click here

notice and declaration of statement of assessments, reconciliations, and settlements

 

 

Share

19 Responses to “#HATJ- Final Notice Praecipe and Rejection Notice Fillings”

  1. Jennifer says : Reply

    My heart is overflowing! What absolutely brilliant BEing and DOing for ALL!

  2. Shirley Z says : Reply

    WELL DONE ORIGINALS!!!!!! , It is Factualized, It is Complete, it is absolute!!!! I AM DANCING TO MJ’s CAN YOU FEEL IT 🙂 🙂 <3 <3 <3

  3. Cary says : Reply

    If Heather gets $48,836,001,010,000,000,000.00 will that leave any money left for Randy or will they need to share?

    • LC says : Reply

      I believe the big amount is for the people. I don’t see her name in the description box. Her purpose is to help everyone.. that’s what I feel.

      & Thank you Heather & all souls for ALL that you do. I am SO happy to finally experience this!

    • Reuben Emmanual Bailey says : Reply

      That amount is for Heather. Randy would be entitled to more (he would have to do his own bill for it) because he has been in jail longer.

      When it comes to the actual value of either one of them, or any of us, even this whopping big number does not hold a candle to that value.

  4. Jeanne Marie says : Reply

    AMAZING… GRACE!
    BEAUTIFUL work, HATJ… Love and gratitude.
    Keep On Keeping On.

  5. Greg says : Reply

    Amazing Notice – just a question, why is Randall’s name crossed out on page 6?

    • BZ ⒾAM Riger says : Reply

      because the “monies” charged in the Notice and Declaration of Statement of Assessments, Reconciliations, and Settlements, are not charged to RKB.

      and now that it is after 9 AM EST, the deadline has passed, and that amount is now double every minute, and compounded.

  6. EstherBE says : Reply

    EXCELLENT! Today Would Be A Great Day For “Global Currency Reset” Announcement; Freedom For All. Let’s Keep Our Energies Elevated For The Highest Good Of All.

    Peace And Love,
    EB

  7. In Gratitude & Joy !! For the Highest Good 4 ALL <3

  8. Damon Lee says : Reply

    AWESOME! The efforts that have brought forth for the voice of the people is phenomenal. I wish to add POSITIVE energy and vibration t the cause!!!!! TOGETHER, let’s end this hypocritical SLAVERY mindset and live the way OUR CREATOR intended…FREE!!!

  9. Nana M. says : Reply

    For those of us who are not fluent in Legalese, please translate. I have no clue what this means!

    Thankyou,
    Nana M.

  10. Janna B. Hampton says : Reply

    LOVE LIGHT PEACE ABUNDANCE Heather & Randy ..
    I LOVE YOU ALL TO THE EXTREME!!!!!

  11. Mark says : Reply

    THIS IS GREAT NEWS — I AM NOT REALLY SURE WHAT IT TOTALLY MEANS YET BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE A BIG STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
    +
    Praecipe Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.
    https://definitions.uslegal.com/p/praecipe/
    Praecipe in Latin means ‘to Command’. Praecipe is a … At common law it is a writ ordering a defendant to do some act or to explain why inaction is appropriate.
    +
    Praecipe Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.
    https://definitions.uslegal.com/p/praecipe/
    Praecipe in Latin means ‘to Command’. Praecipe is a … At common law it is a writ ordering a defendant to do some act or to explain why inaction is appropriate.

  12. Trespass Unwanted says : Reply

    I know nothing, if I think I know something I know nothing.
    Since I know nothing, this writing is only opinion and not statements of fact.
    BZ my posts were wordy enough for you to state the wordy posters should get their own blog.
    I asked you to post one more wordy post, stating I would not post here again.
    Someone asked me to post this opinion, it does not have to be published, as I’m sharing it with you and HATJ.

    Heather has challenged the jurisdiction of the court.
    The system uses carrots on sticks to redirect attention from where it would normally hold.

    The two areas I pay attention to is the ‘first’ thing that started this action, for which I wrote a long post regarding my opinion was the grand jury indictment. If Heather is stating the unrebutted UCC stands as judgment, it is possible the same will be claimed of the grand jury indictment which is ‘unsealed’, and therefore public and unchallenged/unrebutted.

    The second carrot I saw was the ‘intentional’ misrepresentation of the preacipe. The goal of an intentional misrepresentation in my opinion is to get One to focus where the misrepresentation intends and therefore causes One to miss the opportunity to rebut a claim.

    In my opinion the misrepresented motion to dismiss was could be an intentional misrepresentation to introduce the Procedure History to claim the people (not corporation grand jury) made the decision, but the corporation use of the grand jury for corporate matters, in my opinion is crossing jurisdictional boundaries.

    The grand jury indictment is unsealed, public, and unrebutted.
    If unrebutted claims stand as judgment, that is the first judgment, after the foreclosed United States attempts to gain standing using the people, in my opinion.

    Grand Jury is constitutional, not statutory. It is state of Tennessee, not STATE OF TENNESSEE.

    the purported misrepresented motion to dismiss may be used to claim to have the purportedly ‘properly’ identified HATJ starting in D.C. and up to this date in corporate TENNESSEE. In my opinion this filing is ‘unrebutted’ as a public record that it is judged to be fact as the opportunity to state otherwise (rebut it) was not made.

    HATJ rebutted the order, but not the procedural history. This battle is of words on paper, and 30 days of that paper holding it’s power without rebuttal may make it stand against the preacipe.

    I am not a lawyer, but maybe HATJ knows what I convey in this opinion.
    I only post because I was asked to share my view. I did remind the One who asked me to post again, that the rule of ‘no trespass’ exists, and I did promise not to post here if you’d post my last writing and you did based on that promise; due to how long my posts usually are. I do not teach and will not start my own blog.

    Be well.
    Love.

    • Ann says : Reply

      EXCELLENTLY WORDED TRESPASS,HEATHER AND BZ HOPE YOU GET THIS MESSAGE FROM TRESPASS. THANK YOU TRESPASS FOR SHARING YOUR KNOWLEDGE WE ALL APPRECIATE YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE WHO SHARE THERE KNOWINGS AND DOINGS 🙂

  13. Ron says : Reply

    a rebuttal to the U.S. Attorney’s objection is probably in order as presumptions are considered fact if not rebutted and supported by these fictions case law. The calling of “sovereign citizens” and other nonsense. More importantly is the lack of challenge of territorial jurisdiction. A plaintiff cannot move a court if the parties are not in the same location. In other words, the court is in want of jurisdiction due to Plaintiffs lack of TJ. That all said, if Heather believes a contract/agreement is in full force and effect then the trust and filings she did carry the weight and therefore the court may lack certain jurisdiction. Time will tell to see what the court decides. Godspeed

Leave a Reply

TOP